Hi folks,
Over on
https://github.com/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide/pull/305#issuecomment-304169735
we're looking to update the theming of packaging.python.org to match
that of the language documentation at docs.python.org.
Doing that would also entail updating the documentation of the
individ
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Mark Shannon wrote:
> I really like this PEP in general. I think this brings the type system for
> type-hints closer to Python semantics.
>
Thank you.
> But there are a few points I disagree with.
> I don't think Protocol types should be tied to ABCs. It just
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Given the abstract, I'd suggest "Structural Subtyping" as a suitable
> title for the PEP.
>
Maybe even "Structural Subtyping (a.k.a. Duck Typing)"
> That said, I think it's fine to use "protocol" throughout the rest of
> the PEP as is cur
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2017-05-19 - 2017-05-26)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open5999 (+31)
closed 36241 (+50)
total 42240 (+81)
Open issues wit
