I hope this is the proper place for internals questions...
I have a core file (produced via the gcore command) of a linux python2.6
process. I need to extract the byte code and de-compile it.
I looked at https://wiki.python.org/moin/DebuggingWithGdb and related pages.
However, these all seem
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Cory Benfield wrote:
>
> On 6 Jun 2017, at 18:49, Jim Baker wrote:
>
> With Nick's suggestion of _tls_bootstrap, this has certainly become more
> complicated. I'm still thinking of the ramifications for future Jython 2.7
> support, if Python dev goes down this pat
On Jun 7, 2017 6:29 AM, "Victor Stinner" wrote:
2017-06-07 10:56 GMT+02:00 Nathaniel Smith :
> Another testing challenge is that the stdlib ssl module has no way to
> trigger a renegotiation, and therefore there's no way to write tests
> to check that it properly handles a renegotiation, even tho
Hi,
I hope this is the right place to post this kind of question. If not I
apologize.
I was simply wondering if anyone had been looking into supporting RFC 6920 (
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6920).
For a simple example of what this is about see
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6920#section-8
> On 7 Jun 2017, at 14:29, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> 2017-06-07 10:56 GMT+02:00 Nathaniel Smith :
>> Another testing challenge is that the stdlib ssl module has no way to
>> trigger a renegotiation, and therefore there's no way to write tests
>> to check that it properly handles a renegotiation,
2017-06-07 10:56 GMT+02:00 Nathaniel Smith :
> Another testing challenge is that the stdlib ssl module has no way to
> trigger a renegotiation, and therefore there's no way to write tests
> to check that it properly handles a renegotiation, even though
> renegotiation is by far the trickiest part o
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Jim Baker wrote:
> With Nick's suggestion of _tls_bootstrap, this has certainly become more
> complicated. I'm still thinking of the ramifications for future Jython 2.7
> support, if Python dev goes down this path. It still seems easier to me to
> avoid exposing th
> On 6 Jun 2017, at 18:49, Jim Baker wrote:
>
> With Nick's suggestion of _tls_bootstrap, this has certainly become more
> complicated. I'm still thinking of the ramifications for future Jython 2.7
> support, if Python dev goes down this path. It still seems easier to me to
> avoid exposing t
