Just a reminder that 3.7.0b2 is almost upon us. Please get your feature
fixes, bug fixes, and documentation updates in before 2018-02-26 ~23:59
Anywhere on Earth (UTC-12:00). That's a little over 1.5 days from now.
Also, as previously noted, for those of you who asked for and received
extensions fo
Thanks. Do you know if this gets backported to 3.7?
Eric.
On 2/25/2018 1:36 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 2/25/2018 11:56 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
+ # specify any value in the deecorator).
I fixed this through the web interface. The CI now knows that a comment
change does not need test
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:36 AM, Serhiy Storchaka
wrote:
> 23.02.18 19:30, Guido van Rossum пише:
>
>> I'm not saying anything new here, but since you asked specifically for my
>> opinion: I don't care for the idiom; it's never occurred to me before, and
>> it smells of cleverness. If I saw it in
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:11 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Feb 25 2018, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>>> On Feb 22 2018, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
1. Inner generator expression:
result = [y + g(y) for y in (f(x) for x in range
23.02.18 19:30, Guido van Rossum пише:
I'm not saying anything new here, but since you asked specifically for
my opinion: I don't care for the idiom; it's never occurred to me
before, and it smells of cleverness. If I saw it in a code review I
would probably ask for a regular for-loop to make t
Le 25/02/2018 à 14:11, Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
> On Feb 25 2018, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>>> On Feb 22 2018, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
1. Inner generator expression:
result = [y + g(y) for y in (f(x) for x in range(10))]
On Feb 25 2018, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> On Feb 22 2018, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>>> 1. Inner generator expression:
>>>
>>> result = [y + g(y) for y in (f(x) for x in range(10))]
>>>
>> [...]
>>>
>>> And maybe there are other ways.
>>
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Feb 22 2018, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>> 1. Inner generator expression:
>>
>> result = [y + g(y) for y in (f(x) for x in range(10))]
>>
> [...]
>>
>> And maybe there are other ways.
>
> I think the syntax recently brough up by Nick is
On Feb 22 2018, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 1. Inner generator expression:
>
> result = [y + g(y) for y in (f(x) for x in range(10))]
>
[...]
>
> And maybe there are other ways.
I think the syntax recently brough up by Nick is still the most
beautiful:
result = [ (f(x) as y) + g(y) for x i
