A 3.7 update: Python 3.7.0b5 is now the final beta preview of Python 3.7,
the next feature release of Python. 3.7.0b4 was intended to be the final
beta but, due to some unexpected compatibility issues discovered during
beta testing of third-party packages, we decided to revert some changes
in how P
2018-05-30 18:02 GMT+02:00 Nathaniel Smith :
> On Wed, May 30, 2018, 07:30 Victor Stinner wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone would benefit of MemoryBIO in Python 2.7? Twisted,
>> asyncio, trio, urllib3, anyone else?
>
> Asyncio and trio are strongly py3-only. Twisted's TLS functionality is built
> around py
I doubt responding to python-list-bounces made it back, so I've added
the emails from the original message.
As Brett says, this is clearly someone else's build of Python (for
starters, Python 2.7 should not be using ucrtbase.dll), so you would be
best to track them down.
Also, the best address fo
If you look you will see this is being executed from within Kodi, so this
is probably an embedding situation where Kodi has a bug and they are
triggering a crash in the interpreter.
On Wed, 30 May 2018 at 09:22 wrote:
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Oscar Ortiz Garcia (A
--- Begin Message ---
Dear Windows developer,
I'm a program manager in the Partner App Experience Team at Microsoft. We're
reaching out to notify you of a potential issue in one of your applications.
This issue is automatically generated by Windows Error Reporting, a system
which generates an e
On Wed, May 30, 2018, 07:30 Victor Stinner wrote:
> Does anyone would benefit of MemoryBIO in Python 2.7? Twisted,
> asyncio, trio, urllib3, anyone else?
Asyncio and trio are strongly py3-only. Twisted's TLS functionality is
built around pyopenssl, so the stdlib ssl module doesn't affect them.
Hi,
tl; dr I will withdraw the PEP 546 in one week if noboy shows up to
finish the implementation.
Last year,I wrote the PEP 546 with Cory Benfield:
"Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7"
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0546/
The plan was to get a Python 2.7 implementation
2018-05-30 14:30 GMT+02:00 Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev :
> What's the big idea of separate buildbots anyway? I thought the purpose of
> CI is to test everything _before_
> it breaks the main codebase. Then it's the job of the contributor rather
> than maintainer to fix any breakages.
I will answer
On 30 May 2018 at 22:30, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev
wrote:
> What's the big idea of separate buildbots anyway? I thought the purpose of
> CI is to test everything _before_
> it breaks the main codebase. Then it's the job of the contributor rather
> than maintainer to fix any breakages.
>
> So,
On 30 May 2018 at 20:43, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 29.05.18 17:15, Steve Dower пише:
>
>> Looks like it breaks the 3.7 ABI, which is certainly not allowed at this
>> time. But it’s not a limited API structure, so no problem for 3.8.
>>
>
> Looks like it breaks only extensions that use private mac
On 30.05.2018 13:01, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I would like to delegate the maintenance task "watch buildbots", since
I'm already very busy with many other maintenance tasks. I'm looking
for volunteers to handle incoming emails on buildbot-status. I already
started to explain to Pablo Galindo Sa
29.05.18 17:15, Steve Dower пише:
Looks like it breaks the 3.7 ABI, which is certainly not allowed at this
time. But it’s not a limited API structure, so no problem for 3.8.
Looks like it breaks only extensions that use private macros
_PyObject_GC_TRACK, _PyObject_GC_UNTRACK and _PyObject_GC_I
Hi,
I would like to delegate the maintenance task "watch buildbots", since
I'm already very busy with many other maintenance tasks. I'm looking
for volunteers to handle incoming emails on buildbot-status. I already
started to explain to Pablo Galindo Salgado how to do that, but it
would be great t
Hi,
I fixed a few tests which failed randomly. There are still a few, but
the most annoying have been fixed. I will continue to keep an eye on
our CIs: Travis CI, AppVeyor and buildbots. Sometimes, even when I
report a regression, the author doesn't fix the bug. But when a test
fails on Travis CI
14 matches
Mail list logo
