Re: [Python-Dev] Experiment an opt-in new C API for Python? (leave current API unchanged)

2018-11-11 Thread Victor Stinner
Le sam. 10 nov. 2018 à 04:02, Nathaniel Smith a écrit : > So is it fair to say that your plan is that CPython will always use > the current ("old") API internally, and the "new" API will be > essentially an abstraction layer, that's designed to let people write > C extensions that target the old

Re: [Python-Dev] Signalling NANs

2018-11-11 Thread Greg Ewing
Steven D'Aprano wrote: The Debian box uses an ARM processor, so there's that difference too. FWIW, I tried this on MacOSX 10.6 with an Intel Xeon and it also seems to suppress sNaNs. -- Greg ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org

Re: [Python-Dev] Signalling NANs

2018-11-11 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 04:27:29PM -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Apparently loading a sNaN into an x87 register silently converts it to > a qNaN, and on Linux C compilers are allowed to do that at any point: > > >

Re: [Python-Dev] Get a running instance of the doc for a PR.

2018-11-11 Thread Stephane Wirtel
Mariatta, Do you think we could add a webhook for the build of the documentation for each PR where the build of the doc works? Stéphane -- Stéphane Wirtel - https://wirtel.be - @matrixise ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org