Chris Angelico wrote:
Licence plate numbers do get reused.
And they can change, e.g. if you get a personalised plate.
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
- the object identity is like the registration number or license plate
(unique within the particular system of registering vehicles, but not
unique across systems, and may sometimes be transferred to a new
vehicle after the old one is destroyed)
- the object type is like the
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 8:52 AM Stefan Behnel wrote:
>
> Gregory P. Smith schrieb am 15.11.18 um 01:03:
> > From my point of view: A static inline function is a much nicer modern code
> > style than a C preprocessor macro.
>
> It's also slower to compile, given that function inlining happens at a
> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 22:32:35 +1000
> From: Nick Coghlan
> To: "Steven D'Aprano"
> Cc: python-dev
> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Need discussion for a PR about memory and
> objects
[ munch background ]
>
> Chris's initial suggestion was to use "license number" or "social
> security
I found this (very good) summary ended in a surprising conclusion.
On 18/11/2018 12:32, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 at 23:33, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 11:43:50AM +0100, Stephane Wirtel wrote:
In this PR [https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/3382] "Remove
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 10:11, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 17:49, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > And Just to be clear, I totally support coming up with a totally
> stripped-down C API as I have outlined above as that shouldn't be
> controversial for any VM that wants to have a C-level
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 6:01 AM Richard Damon wrote:
> One issue with things like vehicle registration numbers is that the VIN
> of a vehicle is really a UUID, it is globally unique no other vehicle
> will every have that same ID number, and people may not think of the
> fact that some other ID
On 11/18/18 7:32 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 at 23:33, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 11:43:50AM +0100, Stephane Wirtel wrote:
>>> In this PR [https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/3382] "Remove reference
>>> to
>>> address from the docs, as it only causes
Gregory P. Smith schrieb am 15.11.18 um 01:03:
> From my point of view: A static inline function is a much nicer modern code
> style than a C preprocessor macro.
It's also slower to compile, given that function inlining happens at a much
later point in the compiler pipeline than macro expansion.
Neil Schemenauer schrieb am 17.11.18 um 00:10:
> I think making PyObject an opaque pointer would help.
... well, as long as type checks are still as fast as with "ob_type", and
visible to the C compiler so that it can eliminate redundant ones, I
wouldn't mind. :)
> - Borrowed references are a
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 at 23:33, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 11:43:50AM +0100, Stephane Wirtel wrote:
> > In this PR [https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/3382] "Remove reference
> > to
> > address from the docs, as it only causes confusion", opened by Chris
> > Angelico,
11 matches
Mail list logo
