On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:10 PM Larry Hastings wrote:
> On 11/23/18 5:15 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
>
> Also FWIW, my own 2 cents on the topic of changing the C API: let's
> entirely drop ``PyObject *`` and instead use more opaque
> handles---like a ``PyHandle`` that is defined as a pointer-sized C
>
On 27Nov2018 0609, Victor Stinner wrote:
Note: Again, in my plan, the new C API would be an opt-in API. The old
C API would remain unchanged and fully supported. So there is no
impact on performance if you consider to use the old C API.
This is one of the things that makes me think your plan is
Le mar. 27 nov. 2018 à 01:13, Larry Hastings a écrit :
> (...) I'm not convinced the nice-to-have of "you can't dereference the
> pointer anymore" is worth this runtime overhead.
About the general idea of a new C API.
If you only look at CPython in release mode, there is no benefit. But
you sho
