On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 16:52, Karthikeyan wrote:
> Personally, I think more people will love it once they get to use it so if
> something like 100 issues can be migrated to a sample repo with labels,
> content etc.
We're already using GitHub issues for pretty much everything in Python
core devel
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 03:01, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le lun. 11 mars 2019 à 13:26, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
> > This is the smallest change to PEP 1 that we consider potentially viable:
> > handling all PEPs through the BDFL-Delegate model, with the Steering
> > Council's primary invol
The steering council has decided to reject PEP 542 as the idea never seemed
to gain traction.
Thanks to Markus Meskanen for taking the time to write the PEP.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytho
The steering council decided to defer PEP 536 until an implementation is
available.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/arch
The idea never seemed to gain any traction over its near 5 years in
existence as a PEP.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/
The steering council felt the PEP was too broad and not focused enough.
Discussions about adding more attributes to built-in exceptions can
continue on the issue tracker on a per-exception basis (and obviously here
for any broader points, e.g. performance implications as I know that has
come up bef
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2019-03-08 - 2019-03-15)
Python tracker at https://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open7048 (+17)
closed 41009 (+46)
total 48057 (+63)
Open issues w
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:27:14 -0400
Terry Reedy wrote:
> > First of all, I'm sorry if I'm wrong. I'm not lawyer.
> >
> > You can use both of GPL and MIT. Users can use your package under it.
> >
> > On the other hand, when you publish your package, *you* should follow
> > PSF license.
> > Read
Le 15 mars 2019 à 03:49:19, Steven D'Aprano
(st...@pearwood.info(mailto:st...@pearwood.info)) a écrit:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 03:21:31AM -0700, Rémi Lapeyre wrote:
>
> > When __index__ is defined it means that there is a lossless conversion
> > to int possible. In this case, this means a lossle
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:03:26 -0400
David Mertz wrote:
> Parrot got rather further along than rattlesnake as a register based VM. I
> don't think it every really beat CPython in speed though.
>
> http://parrot.org/
But Parrot also had a "generic" design that was supposed to cater for
all dynamic
10 matches
Mail list logo
