https://blog.python.org/2019/03/python-373-is-now-available.html
Python 3.7.3 is now available. Python 3.7.3 is the next
maintenance release of Python 3.7, the latest feature release of Python.
You can find Python 3.7.3 here:
https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-373/
See the What’s
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 2:03 PM Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 3/24/2019 8:21 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> > We'll be announcing those appointments as we go, so I'm happy to
> > report that I will be handling the BDFL-Delegate responsibilities for
> > the following PEPs:
>
> Where do we discuss these?
>
On 25Mar2019 0812, Martin (gzlist) wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 16:12, Steve Dower wrote:
On 22Mar2019 0433, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
The question is: why would you use a array.array() with a Windows C API?
I started replying to this with a whole lot of examples, and eventually
convinced myse
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 16:12, Steve Dower wrote:
>
> On 22Mar2019 0433, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > The question is: why would you use a array.array() with a Windows C API?
>
> I started replying to this with a whole lot of examples, and eventually
> convinced myself that you wouldn't (or shouldn't)
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:53 PM Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 14:39, Inada Naoki wrote:
> > We have many ways to deprecation:
> >
> > * Document only deprecation (no warning) -- no actual removal is planned.
> > * FutureWarning -- to warn end users.
> > * DeprecationWarning -- to
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:53:07 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 14:39, Inada Naoki wrote:
> > We have many ways to deprecation:
> >
> > * Document only deprecation (no warning) -- no actual removal is planned.
> > * FutureWarning -- to warn end users.
> > * DeprecationWarning --
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 14:39, Inada Naoki wrote:
> We have many ways to deprecation:
>
> * Document only deprecation (no warning) -- no actual removal is planned.
> * FutureWarning -- to warn end users.
> * DeprecationWarning -- to warn Python developers.
> * PendingDeprecationWarning -- to warn P
On 25Mar2019 03:52, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 3/25/2019 12:27 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
I was thinking about IDLE and its tangled web of circular inports,
but I am now convinced that this change will not affect it. Indeed,
idlelib/pyshell.py already implements idea of the proposal, ending
with
On 3/25/2019 12:27 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 24Mar2019 23:22, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 3/24/2019 10:01 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 3/24/2019 7:00 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Did you have a specific scenario in mind?
I was thinking about IDLE and its tangled web of circular inports,
but I am
