Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 580/590 discussion

2019-04-02 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2019-04-02 21:38, Mark Shannon wrote: Hi, On 01/04/2019 6:31 am, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: I added benchmarks for PEP 590: https://gist.github.com/jdemeyer/f0d63be8f30dc34cc989cd11d43df248 Thanks. As expected for calls to C function for both PEPs and master perform about the same, as they are

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 590 discussion

2019-04-02 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
In one of the ways to call C functions in PEP 580, the function gets access to: - the arguments, - "self", the object - the class that the method was found in (which is not necessarily type(self)) I still have to read the details, but when combined with LOAD_METHOD/CALL_METHOD optimization (avoidi

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 590 discussion

2019-04-02 Thread Mark Shannon
Hi, On 02/04/2019 1:49 pm, Petr Viktorin wrote: On 3/30/19 11:36 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2019-03-30 17:30, Mark Shannon wrote: 2. The claim that PEP 580 allows "certain optimizations because other code can make assumptions" is flawed. In general, the caller cannot make assumptions about t

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 580/590 discussion

2019-04-02 Thread Mark Shannon
Hi, On 01/04/2019 6:31 am, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: I added benchmarks for PEP 590: https://gist.github.com/jdemeyer/f0d63be8f30dc34cc989cd11d43df248 Thanks. As expected for calls to C function for both PEPs and master perform about the same, as they are using almost the same calling conventio

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 590 discussion

2019-04-02 Thread Petr Viktorin
On 3/30/19 11:36 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2019-03-30 17:30, Mark Shannon wrote: 2. The claim that PEP 580 allows "certain optimizations because other code can make assumptions" is flawed. In general, the caller cannot make assumptions about the callee or vice-versa. Python is a dynamic langu

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP-582 and multiple Python installations

2019-04-02 Thread Steve Dower
On 02Apr2019 0817, Calvin Spealman wrote: (I originally posted this to python-ideas, where I was told none of this PEP's authors subscribe so probably no one will see it there, so I'm posting it here to raise the issue where it can get seen and hopefully discussed) Correct, thanks for posting

Re: [Python-Dev] how to rerun the job “Azure Pipelines PR”?

2019-04-02 Thread Steve Dower
On 02Apr2019 0522, Karthikeyan wrote: Closing and re-opening the PR will trigger the CI run again that might help in this case but it will run all the jobs. Yes, I believe this is still the best way to re-run Pipelines jobs. For people with logins (not yet everyone in the GitHub org, but I hea

[Python-Dev] PEP-582 and multiple Python installations

2019-04-02 Thread Calvin Spealman
(I originally posted this to python-ideas, where I was told none of this PEP's authors subscribe so probably no one will see it there, so I'm posting it here to raise the issue where it can get seen and hopefully discussed) While the PEP does show the version number as part of the path to the act

Re: [Python-Dev] how to rerun the job “Azure Pipelines PR”?

2019-04-02 Thread Karthikeyan
Closing and re-opening the PR will trigger the CI run again that might help in this case but it will run all the jobs. -- Regards, Karthikeyan S ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubs

[Python-Dev] how to rerun the job “Azure Pipelines PR”?

2019-04-02 Thread Xin, Peixing
Hi, Experts: Anyone can tell how to rerun the job “Azure Pipelines PR” for my PR? Sometimes my PR failed but this is caused by externals. The next day this external issue was fixed then I might want to rerun this specific job on my PR to get the new result. How can I reach this? [cid:image001.