This belongs on python-ideas, not python-dev. I've directed replies to
this message there. Comments below.
On 26May2019 21:52, Montana Burr wrote:
NumPy arrays have this awesome feature, where array == 3 does an
element-wise comparison and returns a list. For example:
np.array([1,2,3,4,5])==3
NumPy arrays have this awesome feature, where array == 3 does an
element-wise comparison and returns a list. For example:
np.array([1,2,3,4,5])==3
returns
[False,False,True,False,False]
It would be cool if Python had similar functionality for lists.
If that is not possible, perhaps we could co
Thanks Steve for your comments, I appreciate them. As I said I don't
know if this is a good idea or not so please read my responses below as
part of a friendly debate aimed at reaching consensus, not an argument.
(The argument is in Room 12 with Mr. Barnard.)
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:54:05AM
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 04:03:11PM +0300, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
> On 24.05.2019 9:55, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >I don't know if this is a good idea or a terrible idea or somewhere in
> >between, so I'm throwing it out to see if anyone likes it.
[...]
> This would greately damage Pytho
On 5/26/2019 10:02 AM, Thomas Wouters wrote:
As PEP-delegate, I'm accepting version 5 of PEP 587 (Python
Initialization Configuration).
...
Thanks, Victor, for pushing this massive amount of work through;
And thanks to you for reviewing and approving.
it
won't affect most people using Py
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 8:00 PM Daniel Moisset wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the work on this proposal, I think this is at least a tip
> of the iceberg and a good start for the bigger question of how the stdlib
> should evolve..
>
> I think that the PEP should include an idea of what should happen if
>
[Larry Hastings ]
> I have a computer with two Xeon CPUs and 256GB of RAM. So, even
> though it's NUMA, I still have 128GB of memory per CPU. It's running a
> "spin" of Ubuntu 18.10.
>
> I compiled a fresh Python 3.7.3 --with-optimizations. I copied the sample
> program straight off the StackOve
Hi,
I'd like to get https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/6641 merged.
I keep having to rebase it and regenerate all the importlib header
files, which is becoming a bit annoying.
So, I can I ask that if you are going to modify Python/ceval.c can
you hold on just a little while, until #6641 is
As PEP-delegate, I'm accepting version 5 of PEP 587 (Python Initialization
Configuration). I don't think Victor has posted the latest version, but it
contains a couple of minor renames, and a new private API to allow us to
experiment with two-phase initialisation of Python.
There's still time to d
On 24.05.2019 9:55, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I don't know if this is a good idea or a terrible idea or somewhere in
between, so I'm throwing it out to see if anyone likes it.
Let's add a third option to PEP 594 between "keep" and "remove":
explicitly flagging a module as unmaintained. Unmaintained
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 09:20:53PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Sure, but this PEP is all about defining things that weren't
> previously defined, so I wanted to clarify intent rather than current
> behaviour.
As I understand it, the intent is to:
- fix some annoyances/bugs involved when you h
On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 12:23, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 8:07 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 08:44:33AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >
> > > From my reading of the description, you could also "assert a is b" -
> > > is that correct?
> >
> > Yes, tha
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 8:07 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 08:44:33AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > From my reading of the description, you could also "assert a is b" -
> > is that correct?
>
> Yes, that's already the behaviour.
>
> py> def demo():
> ... a = locals()
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 08:04:11PM +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Richard, your email seems to have introduced a spurious "SPAM" label
[...]
> edit the subject line to remove the
> label? Thanks. I've done so for this response
Oops. Done now.
--
Steven
__
Richard, your email seems to have introduced a spurious "SPAM" label
to this thread, which may confuse some email clients into treating it
as spam. Can you teach your email program that this mailing list is ham,
not spam, or failing that, at least edit the subject line to remove the
label? Thanks.
(And this time I will remember to remove the SPAM label...)
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 08:44:33AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> From my reading of the description, you could also "assert a is b" -
> is that correct?
Yes, that's already the behaviour.
py> def demo():
... a = locals()
... b
On Fri, 24 May 2019 09:54:05 -0700
Steve Dower wrote:
>
> All in all, this is basically where we are today, with the exception
> that we haven't officially said that we no longer support these modules.
> PEP 594 is this official statement, and our usual process for things we
> don't support is
On 5/22/19 12:15 PM, Tim Peters wrote:
There's a Stackoverflow report[1] I suspect is worth looking into, but
it requires far more RAM (over 80GB) than I have). [...]
But, for a start, it would be good to know if anyone else can actually
reproduce the problem.
[1]
https://stackoverflow.com/ques
On Fri, 24 May 2019 14:23:21 +0200
Thomas Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 5:15 PM Steve Dower wrote:
>
> > On 23May2019 0542, Inada Naoki wrote:
> > > 1. perf shows 95% of CPU time is eaten by _PyObject_Free, not kernel
> > space.
> > > 2. This loop is cleary hot:
> > >
> > http
19 matches
Mail list logo
