Serhiy Storchaka schrieb am 01.06.19 um 09:02:
> I have a related proposition. Yesterday I have reported two bugs (and Pablo
> quickly fixed them) related to handling positional-only arguments. These
> bugs were occurred due to subtle changing the meaning of co_argcount. When
> we make some
>
> I propose to make co_argcount meaning the number of positional
> parameters (i.e. positional-only + positional-or-keyword). This would
> remove the need of changing the code that uses co_argcount.
>
I like the proposal, it will certainly make handling normal cases
downstream much easier
On Fri, 31 May 2019 11:58:22 -0700
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:39 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >
> > On May 31, 2019, at 01:22, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> > > I second this.
> > >
> > > There are currently ~7000 bugs open on bugs.python.org. The Web UI
> > > makes a good
31.05.19 11:46, Petr Viktorin пише:
PEP 570 (Positional-Only Parameters) changed the signatures of
PyCode_New() and types.CodeType(), adding a new argument for "posargcount".
Our policy for such changes seems to be fragmented tribal knowledge. I'm
writing to check if my understanding is
