On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 12:35 AM Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
>
> Jonathan Goble writes:
>
> > As for me, I'll continue to lurk and learn as I continue my sophomore
> > year as a college student majoring in computer science, with hopes of
> > becoming more active in contributing to Python as I gai
Jonathan Goble writes:
> As for me, I'll continue to lurk and learn as I continue my sophomore
> year as a college student majoring in computer science, with hopes of
> becoming more active in contributing to Python as I gain more
> experience and skills.
Evidently you have ambition to acquir
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 5:23 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2019, at 12:56, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> > Volunteers are welcome! :)
>
> Wow, that was fast! Thanks for the offers for help. I’ll add everyone who’s
> stepped up so far to the list moderators. Yes, you do get a notification
> e
[Inada Naoki , trying mimalloc]
>>> Hmm, it is not good. mimalloc uses MADV_FREE so it may affect to some
>>> benchmarks. I will look it later.
>> ...
>> $ ./python -m pyperf compare_to pymalloc-mem.json mimalloc-mem.json -G
>> Slower (60):
>> - logging_format: 10.6 MB +- 384.2 kB -> 27.2 MB +-
Python 3.7.4 is now available. 3.7.4 is the next maintenance release of
Python 3.7, the latest feature release of Python. You can find the
release files, a link to the changelog, and more information here:
https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-374/
See the "What’s New In Python 3.7"
I’ve updated the official images to include 3.8.0b2:
https://gitlab.com/python-devs/ci-images/tree/master
Cheers,
-Barry
> On Jul 4, 2019, at 15:05, Łukasz Langa wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> After a few days of delay, but somewhat cutely timed with the US Independence
> Day, I present you Pyt
On 07/08/2019 03:12 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
[even further off-topic]
While I have the attention of so many community-spirited individuals, I might
mention that webmaster@ could do with a few lurkers to get used to the traffic.
At present it's solely maintained by Mats Wichmann and me, and I'm
[even further off-topic]
While I have the attention of so many community-spirited individuals, I
might mention that webmaster@ could do with a few lurkers to get used to
the traffic. At present it's solely maintained by Mats Wichmann and me, and
I'm planning to step back from all PSF duties soon.
>. If it doesn't, could this one optimization
be left in the peephole optimizer at bytecode level?
Sadly no, because at that time there is not enough information left to do
things correctly. The problem manifest with constructs like
if something or __debug__:
...
You cannot just look at the b
On Jul 8, 2019, at 12:56, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Volunteers are welcome! :)
Wow, that was fast! Thanks for the offers for help. I’ll add everyone who’s
stepped up so far to the list moderators. Yes, you do get a notification every
day with a link right to the moderation page.
Cheers,
-Barry
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
> Hopefully Pablo's proposed solution works.
I'm sure it will.
> If it doesn't, could this one optimization be left in the peephole
> optimizer at bytecode level? Otherwise is another solution to follow
> through with
> https://discuss.python
On 08.07.2019 23:10, Jonathan Goble wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019, 3:56 PM Barry Warsaw mailto:ba...@python.org>> wrote:
On Jul 8, 2019, at 12:27, Jonathan Goble mailto:jcgob...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Is there a solution to this that would enable moderators to approve
> more frequently?
Fred Drake wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:59 PM Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org... wrote:
> > I’m not a super active moderator, but I do have to
> > say that it’s so much
> > easier to clear the queue now that the list is on Mailman 3. That said,
> > it still takes active participation in order t
On 07/08/2019 12:56 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I’m not a super active moderator, but I do have to say that it’s so much easier
to clear the queue now that the list is on Mailman 3. That said, it still
takes active participation in order to review held messages.
Volunteers are welcome! :)
Sign
Hopefully Pablo's proposed solution works. If it doesn't, could this one
optimization be left in the peephole optimizer at bytecode level? Otherwise is
another solution to follow through with
https://discuss.python.org/t/switch-pythons-parsing-tech-to-something-more-powerful-than-ll-1/379
and s
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 03:27:50PM -0400, Jonathan Goble wrote:
> (I don't know the best list to post this to, so if this is not it,
> please forgive me and point me in the right direction. Thanks.)
>
> So my inbox, and probably many of yours, was flooded this afternoon
> with a dozen-plus emails
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019, 3:56 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2019, at 12:27, Jonathan Goble wrote:
>
> > Is there a solution to this that would enable moderators to approve
> > more frequently?
>
> Volunteers are welcome! :)
>
> -Barry
>
I'd offer to volunteer, but I am merely a lurker and not
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:59 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I’m not a super active moderator, but I do have to say that it’s so much
> easier to clear the queue now that the list is on Mailman 3. That said,
> it still takes active participation in order to review held messages.
...
> Volunteers are welc
On Jul 8, 2019, at 12:27, Jonathan Goble wrote:
> So my inbox, and probably many of yours, was flooded this afternoon
> with a dozen-plus emails from the Python-Announce list. I understand
> that this list requires every email to be manually approved by a
> moderator.
I cleared the queue this mo
(I don't know the best list to post this to, so if this is not it,
please forgive me and point me in the right direction. Thanks.)
So my inbox, and probably many of yours, was flooded this afternoon
with a dozen-plus emails from the Python-Announce list. I understand
that this list requires every
Is there a way for people to give input to the challenges facing Python
discussion? I'm picturing something like people writing short statements of
perceived challenges and submitting them so that the SC has more ideas on
its radar.
___
Python-Dev mailing
Hi Simon,
There are several ways to share constructive feedback. You may email the
steering council, file an issue on the public steering council repo, or create
a discussion thread on Discourse or python-dev.
Thanks!
Carol
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019, at 12:35 PM, Simon Cross wrote:
> Is there a way
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 11:32 PM Inada Naoki wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 8:09 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> > Ah, interesting. Were you able to measure the memory footprint as well?
> >
>
> Hmm, it is not good. mimalloc uses MADV_FREE so it may affect to some
> benchmarks. I will look it
Sorry for the incorrect link. Here is the corrected link:
https://github.com/python/steering-council/blob/master/updates/2019-07-08_steering-council-update.md
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019, at 7:16 AM, Carol Willing wrote:
> I've posted an update from the Steering Council to our repo:
> https://github.com
I've posted an update from the Steering Council to our repo:
https://github.com/python/steering-council/blob/master/updates/2019-07-08_steering-council
I will also link to this on python-dev and on Discourse (discuss.python.org ).
For completeness, below is the full text.
# Steering Council U
25 matches
Mail list logo
