Mark Shannon wrote:
> If `run()` can raise
> an exception, why not let it return values?
If there's not an implementation detail that makes this impractical,
I'd like to give my +1 on the `Interpreter.run()` method returning
values. From a usability perspective, it seems incredibly convenient
to h
On 22/04/2020 19:40, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 4/21/20 12:32 PM, Mark Shannon wrote:
Hi,
I'm generally in favour of PEP 554, but I don't think it is ready to
be accepted in its current form.
BTW, thanks for including the name of the PEP in the subject. As a
casual reader of this list, i
On 4/21/20 12:32 PM, Mark Shannon wrote:
Hi,
I'm generally in favour of PEP 554, but I don't think it is ready to
be accepted in its current form.
BTW, thanks for including the name of the PEP in the subject. As a
casual reader of this list, it's very helpful to have more than just the
n
FYI, I'm not ignoring you. :) Life intervened. I'll respond in the
next day or two.
-eric
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:42 AM Mark Shannon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm generally in favour of PEP 554, but I don't think it is ready to be
> accepted in its current form.
>
> My main objection is that witho
> On 21 Apr 2020, at 16:58, Eric Snow wrote:
>
> Thanks for explaining that, Ronald. It sounds like a lot of the
> effort would relate to making classes work. I have some comments
> in-line below.
>
> -eric
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 2:34 AM Ronald Oussoren
> wrote:
>>> On 21 Apr 2020, a
Eric Snow wrote:
> We will mark it "provisional" in the docs, which I expect will include
> info on what that means and why it is provisional.
If you'd like an example format for marking a section of the docs as
provisional w/ reST, something like this at the top should suffice
(with perhaps somet
