[Python-Dev] Re: Critique of PEP 622 (Structural Pattern Matching)

2020-08-14 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 12:36:25AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote: > Do you have anything new to add to the discussion, or is this 2000 > lines of rehash? Having a summary of objections/critiques in one place is far better than expecting people to wade through multiple huge threads. I've lost coun

[Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues

2020-08-14 Thread Python tracker
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2020-08-07 - 2020-08-14) Python tracker at https://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue. Do NOT respond to this message. Issues counts and deltas: open7623 (+25) closed 45673 (+26) total 53296 (+51) Open issues wi

[Python-Dev] f_localsplus[0] == NULL in super_init_without_args()

2020-08-14 Thread Skip Montanaro
(I'm far from certain this is the correct place for this message. Maybe I should have opened a case on bpo instead?) I got far behind on my register instruction set stuff and in the interim the ground shifted underneath me. I'm still working to try and get the test suite to pass (modulo test_ssl,

[Python-Dev] Re: Critique of PEP 622 (Structural Pattern Matching)

2020-08-14 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 12:32 AM Mark Shannon wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've written up a critique of PEP 622. > Rather than dump a 2000 line email on you all, I've made a git repo. > > https://github.com/markshannon/pep622-critique > I started reading it. You're saying the same things that everyone

[Python-Dev] Critique of PEP 622 (Structural Pattern Matching)

2020-08-14 Thread Mark Shannon
Hi all, I've written up a critique of PEP 622. Rather than dump a 2000 line email on you all, I've made a git repo. https://github.com/markshannon/pep622-critique If you have any corrections or additions to suggest, feel free to submit a PR. If you'd rather not submit a PR, for any reason, ju