On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 8:08 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 5:16 AM Steve Holden wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 7:04 PM Daniel Moisset
>> wrote:
>>
>>> [sorry for the duplicate, meant to reply-all]
>>>
>>> Thank you for this approach, I find it really helpful to put t
Nick Coghlan doesn't want to ever be having conversations about why "case
True:" doesn't behave the same way as "case some.attr.referring.to.true:".
Guido thinks that it strange enough that you won't see it. I agree that it is
odd to define a complicated alias for True, but it isn't so odd to h
Hi folks,
I know this is a high-volume list so sorry for being yet another voice
screaming into your mailbox, but I do not know how else to handle this.
A few months ago, I opened a pull request fixing packed bitfields in
ctypes struct/union, which right now are being incorrectly created. The
off
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 5:16 AM Steve Holden wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 7:04 PM Daniel Moisset
> wrote:
>
>> [sorry for the duplicate, meant to reply-all]
>>
>> Thank you for this approach, I find it really helpful to put the
>> conversation in these terms (semantics and guiding principles
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:47 AM Nilo César Teixeira <
nilo.teixe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not a Python contributor but I have a question which (I believe) can
> be answered here, so I've subscribed.
>
> The question is at stackoverflow:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64912716/
A notorious example here of the "not many" is this proposal (i.e. not part
of the language yet) for C++:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1371r0.pdf . I
think it's an interesting example given that this is a very mature
language, not originally designed with pattern matching
Hello,
I'm not a Python contributor but I have a question which (I believe) can be
answered here, so I've subscribed.
The question is at stackoverflow:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64912716/are-pre-commit-hooks-clonable
After some research the only thing similtar to a git pre-commit hook
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 7:45 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:16 PM Greg Ewing
> wrote:
>
>> On 18/11/20 4:36 pm, Larry Hastings wrote:
>> >
>> > But,
>> > the thinking went, you'd never want to examine the last value from a
>> > list generator, so it was more convenient i
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 7:04 PM Daniel Moisset wrote:
> [sorry for the duplicate, meant to reply-all]
>
> Thank you for this approach, I find it really helpful to put the
> conversation in these terms (semantics and guiding principles).
>
> It does help to rationalise discussion ;-)
> [...]
> 4.
..
Also will matching ever extend into the Typing universe?
In what way do you have in mind? With protocol support baked into PEP 634
that already ties into type hints.
-Brett
.
thanks for the answers; the only one missing is whether there is an actual bestiary of example
I'm sorry, I've been skipping around the discussion a bit, but I'm fairly
certain this suggestion hasn't been proposed yet.
It's perhaps a bit too different from what has been proposed thus far but
maybe that's exactly what's needed to convince the minds, since as far as I
see it most of the parti
11 matches
Mail list logo
