Paul Sokolovsky writes:
> Also to clarify, [cowboy attitude] referred to difference in
> approaches in response to particular issue(s) raised. One thing is
> to say "it's hard to implement it better with the limited VM
> infrastructure and resources we have" (that of course leads to
>
Hello,
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:54:53 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote:
> Paul Sokolovsky writes:
>
> > Well, I'd call that "cowboy attitude in programming language
> > design" ;-).
>
> That was uncalled for, especially since you're selling an idea without
> an implementation yourself.
Paul Sokolovsky writes:
> Well, I'd call that "cowboy attitude in programming language
> design" ;-).
That was uncalled for, especially since you're selling an idea without
an implementation yourself.
> We'd certainly make it blend well with the rest of Python.
But how long will that take?
On 11/28/20 9:30 PM, Paul Ganssle wrote:
Considering the people involved and the nature of the list, I suspect that
adding a new @python.org mailing list would be better than discourse. In my
experience, it's very difficult to just follow a single topic on the discourse,
and most people
> My suggestion: create the developers by creating group(s) of
> mentors
Do you know about
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/core-mentorship.python.org/
and if you do, why isn't that what you suggest?
___
Python-Dev mailing list --
I would subscribe as well for Nixpkgs.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 6:02 PM Tianon Gravi wrote:
> > I'd love to have an easy way to keep them in the loop.
>
> I'm one of the maintainers on https://github.com/docker-library/python
> (which is what results in https://hub.docker.com/_/python), and I'd
On Sun., 29 Nov. 2020, 6:31 am Paul Ganssle, wrote:
> Considering the people involved and the nature of the list, I suspect that
> adding a new @python.org mailing list would be better than discourse. In
> my experience, it's very difficult to just follow a single topic on the
> discourse, and
Hello,
On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 11:36:45 +1100
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 12:10:39AM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>
> > And we don't speak about some obscure "innovative" idea. Const'ness
> > aka immutability is well-known and widely used feature in
> > programming languages.
