[Python-Dev] Re: Please explain how to migrate when a function is removed, thanks ;-)

I opened an issue on Devguide: https://github.com/python/devguide/issues/655 On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:37 AM Kyle Stanley wrote: > On Jan 20, 2021 at 9:51 PM Chros Jerdonek > wrote: > >> Is there / would it make sense to have a section analogous to "Porting to >> Python X" that covers "Make

[Python-Dev] Re: The SC is accepting PEP 632: deprecating distutils

On 1/21/2021 6:30 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: On behalf of the SC, I'm happy to announce that we have chosen to accept PEP 632. Congrats, Steve, and thanks for the work on the PEP! I'll let Steve outline what the next steps are for implementing the PEP. Thanks. Work from this point on will be

[Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues

ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2021-01-15 - 2021-01-22) Python tracker at https://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue. Do NOT respond to this message. Issues counts and deltas: open7578 (+32) closed 47161 (+35) total 54739 (+67) Open issues

[Python-Dev] Re: pathlib.Path: inconsistent symlink_to() and link_to()

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:43 PM Barney Gale wrote: > Hi Brett, > > Per your PR review feedback [0] I left a comment on the bug [1] asking > when the link_to() method should be scheduled for removal. It didn't elicit > a great deal of feedback, so I'm raising this again here! > Per PEP 387

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 651: Robust Overflow Handling, version 2

Hi Guido, On 22/01/2021 5:20 am, Guido van Rossum wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:16 AM Mark Shannon > wrote: I've updated the PEP in light of my experiments and feedback. The new API is simpler and a bit more backwards compatible.