Ok, we have implemented a rough prototype and we have decided not to go
with this for the following reasons:
* Is almost the same storage cost as the solution we already have. Since
storing the node id cost 4 bytes (an integer) per instruction
and our solution needs 2+ bytes per instruction for
Thanks, that's the context I was missing!
Package management is hard. No wonder some folks try to bypass the whole
thing and use Docker images instead. :-(
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:56 AM Christian Heimes
wrote:
> On 18/05/2021 16.19, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > There are a few mentions of
On 18/05/2021 16.19, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> There are a few mentions of Debian, but no explanation of what the issue
> is about. Can you elaborate on that?
Debian and Debian-based distros like Ubuntu are applying downstream
packages and split CPython interpreter and stdlib into multiple
Thanks for the update!
I know this request is a little ironic coming from me, but would it be
possible to state the PEP titles the first time they're mentioned each
month?
Cross referencing is a little awkward when reading the summary on a phone
rather than a full computer.
Cheers,
Nick.
On
There are a few mentions of Debian, but no explanation of what the issue is
about. Can you elaborate on that?
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:15 Thomas Wouters wrote:
>
> The SC has just published the community update for March:
>
>
>
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:51 PM Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
>
> Steve Holden writes:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 11:07 PM Steven D'Aprano
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Steve
> > > (one of the other ones)
> > >
> >
> > We are all other Steves!
>
> +1
>
> There were five Steves (and one Stephanie)
The SC has just published the community update for March:
https://github.com/python/steering-council/blob/main/updates/2021-03-steering-council-update.md
We're still trying to get these done every month, but between the rush of
PEPs and other issues before the 3.10b1 deadline, and PyCon US,
On 5/18/21 5:25 AM, Pablo Galindo Salgado wrote:
Yet another problem that I found:
One integer is actually not enough to assign IDs. One unsigned integer
can cover 4,294,967,295 AST nodes, but is technically possibleto have
more than that in a single file.
Surely you could use a 64-bit int
> One integer is actually not enough to assign IDs.
Actually, disregard this particular problem. I think that we could
perfectly stop assigning IDs if we reach the overflow limit and call it a
day
since you need to have a truly horrendous file to reach 4,294,967,295 AST nodes
(I did some tests to
Yet another problem that I found:
One integer is actually not enough to assign IDs. One unsigned integer can
cover 4,294,967,295 AST nodes, but is technically possible
to have more than that in a single file. While in PEP 657 we are tracking
offsets that are normally very low < 100 typically or
Steve Holden writes:
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 11:07 PM Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>
> > Steve
> > (one of the other ones)
> >
>
> We are all other Steves!
+1
There were five Steves (and one Stephanie) in my 6th grade class (of
27). "Steve, move that " became an idiom
-- Other
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer writes:
> That's why i guess what i am proposing might seem simple
I'm saying that we already have the simple version, spelled
git clone; git checkout main~5000
then
git log -U0 main~5000..main | grep -v '^[-+ ]'
which provides very nice hints for the
Hu, actually another problem of this approach:
Nodes are created and modified after the optimization pass, so the AST
produced by the parser is not enough to reconstruct the actual
information, we need to also run the optimization passes, but
unfortunately, this is (by design) not don't in
thank yohttps://www.credosystemz.com/training-in-chennai/best-angularjs-training-in-chennai//;>u
it gives detailed information about email address
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi Nathaniel,
Thanks a lot for your suggestion! I like the idea although I still think is
more complex than our current proposal, but on the other hand it allows for
a much richer results so I'm quite excited to try it out. We are going to
give it a go to explore it with a prototype and if we are
15 matches
Mail list logo
