On 30/05/2021, Prakhar Sehgal wrote:
> The latest version of Grail is 0.6 which was released in 1999 was made for
> Python 1 but I want to make one compatible with Python 3. But I need help
> for that. Currently me and Guido van Rossum are working on this. Any help
> will be welcomed. This is the
+1 on 'complete'.
If 'enum.unique()' means 'every value has at most one name', then perhaps
`enum.complete()` can mean 'every value has at least one name'? Or is that
not accurate?
Other suggestions: 'occupied', 'full', 'exhaustive'.
Barney
On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 00:02, Jeff Allen wrote:
>
On 28/05/2021 04:24, Ethan Furman wrote:
The flags RED, GREEN, and BLUE are all canonical, while PURPLE and
WHITE are aliases for certain flag combinations. But what if we have
something like:
class Color(Flag):
RED = 1 # 0001
BLUE = 4 # 0100
https://aiostream.readthedocs.io/en/stable/operators.html#aiostream.stream.enumerate
Is a nice version of an async enumerate. It also handles aclosing
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 9:10 AM Julien Palard wrote:
>
> > is the fact some things (like generators) give iterators instead of
> > iterables as a hint they're not "rewindable" was initially thought
> > of and part of the design, or it emerged later.
>
Hm... I don't think that was a big part
Le 5/30/21 à 4:31 PM, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
> What are you trying to get from the archives? It is *possible* that I
> have a personal archive saved somewhere.
I'm not even sure I remember my initial question... But it could be:
> is the fact some things (like generators) give iterators
The latest version of Grail is 0.6 which was released in 1999 was made for
Python 1 but I want to make one compatible with Python 3. But I need help
for that. Currently me and Guido van Rossum are working on this. Any help
will be welcomed. This is the link for the GitHub repo:
What are you trying to get from the archives? It is *possible* that I have
a personal archive saved somewhere.
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 02:39 Julien Palard wrote:
> Le 5/29/21 à 11:14 PM, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
> > It looks like what's left of the archives is largely spam?
>
> Yes.
>
>
Le 5/29/21 à 11:14 PM, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
> It looks like what's left of the archives is largely spam?
Yes.
SourceForge staff has manually hidden most spam on this list a few days
ago to help see better, but the interesting discussion is no longer here.
They checked in the mbox file on
