On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 03:15, Tim Peters wrote:
> You think Steven was indirectly accusing you of unethical behavior
> (trolling for StackOverflow upvotes)?. That's not the sense I got from
> his original reply, but I can understand it if you did. If that's your
> complaint, I'll leave it to
[Marco Sulla ]
> I repeat, even the worst AI will understand from the context what I
> meant.
Amazingly enough, the truth value of a proposition does not increase
via repetition ;-)
>>> bool(True * 1_000_000_000)
True
>>> bool(False * 1_000_000_000)
False
> But let me do a very rude example:
>
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 4:56 AM Serhiy Storchaka
wrote:
> 13.08.21 20:24, Guido van Rossum пише:
> > If these weren't part of the stable ABI, I'd choose (E). But because
> > they are, I think only (A) or (B) are our options. The problem with (C)
> > is that if there's code that links to them but
On 2021-08-15 22:50, Marco Sulla wrote:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 23:33, Tim Peters
wrote:ople have said now, including me, they had no idea what
you meant.by "I pretend your immediate excuses". It's not a complaint
that it's expressed inelegantly, but that they can't make _any_ sense
of it. By
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 7:56 AM Marco Sulla
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 23:33, Tim Peters
> wrote:ople have said now, including me, they had no idea what
> > you meant.by "I pretend your immediate excuses". It's not a complaint
> > that it's expressed inelegantly, but that they can't make
I make an example: what if I said to you that you want, with your
response, only endear Tim? Is it for you sarcastic or a subtle
insinuation?
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 23:58, Irit Katriel wrote:
> The reality, Marco, is that this list is for discussions about python
> development, not for seeking help with understanding python.
> It is not appropriate to "ask for help" on this list, and you are not
> entitled to a reply within X working
This is the source of this whole misunderstanding:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 9:34 PM Marco Sulla
wrote:
>
> I asked for help, because I didn't know __nothing__ about what Monica
> replied to me in the SO answer. And you say to me my post seems spam?
>
> [snipped]
> And you continue to mark my
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 23:33, Tim Peters
wrote:ople have said now, including me, they had no idea what
> you meant.by "I pretend your immediate excuses". It's not a complaint
> that it's expressed inelegantly, but that they can't make _any_ sense
> of it. By my count, this is at least the second
[Marco Sulla ]
> It's the Netiquette, Chris. It's older than Internet. It's a gross
> violation of the Netiquette remarking grammatical or syntactical
> errors. I think that also the least advanced AI will understand what I
> meant.
As multiple people have said now, including me, they had no idea
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 23:12, Tim Peters wrote:
>
> [Marco Sulla ]
> > Oh, this is enough. The sense of the phrase was very clear and you all
> > have understood it.
>
> Sincerely, I have no idea what "I pretend your immediate excuses."
> means, in or out of context.
>
> > Remarking grammatical
It's the Netiquette, Chris. It's older than Internet. It's a gross
violation of the Netiquette remarking grammatical or syntactical
errors. I think that also the least advanced AI will understand what I
meant.
I think anyway that now the sense of my request is __very clear__. I
ask the
[Marco Sulla ]
> Oh, this is enough. The sense of the phrase was very clear and you all
> have understood it.
Sincerely, I have no idea what "I pretend your immediate excuses."
means, in or out of context.
> Remarking grammatical errors is a gross violation
> of the Netiquette. I ask
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 6:36 AM Marco Sulla
wrote:
> > As Chris implied, the second 'sentence' is not grammatical English
>
> Oh, this is enough. The sense of the phrase was very clear and you all
> have understood it. Remarking grammatical errors is a gross violation
> of the Netiquette. I ask
Furthermore, I have 13k points of reputation on SO. They are also too
much for me. I don't need dirty tricks to raise them. So I __pretend__
excuses from Steven, if it is a man.
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 21:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
I opened the bug https://bugs.python.org/issue44921 . Anyway, this
does not change the insinuation I got here.
> In any case, drop this tread, which started off wrongly.
This thread will be dropped when Steven will give me the excuses for
the
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:17 AM Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
> > On 8/13/2021 1:24 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I'm actually not sure what use case you're talking about.
"source/code that hadn't actually changed and was just being re-compiled and
run". I've
SUMMARY: If you, Marco, want to get dicts subclasses made faster and you
seriously think that they can be, open a proper issue on
bugs.python.org., as I describe in 3 below.
In any case, drop this tread, which started off wrongly.
August 6, in response to the weekly post,
Summary of Python
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:24 AM Marco Sulla
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 12:54, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > Are you looking for upvotes on StackOverflow
>
> This is unacceptable. I pretend your immediate excuses.
>
? I don't understand this, what do you mean?
ChrisA
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 12:54, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Are you looking for upvotes on StackOverflow
This is unacceptable. I pretend your immediate excuses.
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
20 matches
Mail list logo
