Will all packages that use Cython have to upgrade Cython to work with 3.10?
That can be a pretty heavy lift. A lot of us pin Cython.
-CHB
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 4:32 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 20. 09. 21 0:10, Thomas Grainger wrote:
> > Are projects that ship pre-compiled wheels impacted? E
On 20. 09. 21 0:10, Thomas Grainger wrote:
Are projects that ship pre-compiled wheels impacted? Eg twisted-iocpsupport ?
I guess that if they managed to compile with 3.10, they shouldn't be.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
Are projects that ship pre-compiled wheels impacted? Eg twisted-iocpsupport
?
On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, 22:09 Miro Hrončok, wrote:
> On 19. 09. 21 21:34, dw-...@d-woods.co.uk wrote:
> > Are you sure Cython is still broken? It looks like it was fixed back in
> May (https://github.com/cython/cython/iss
On 19. 09. 21 21:34, dw-...@d-woods.co.uk wrote:
Are you sure Cython is still broken? It looks like it was fixed back in May
(https://github.com/cython/cython/issues/4153) and all the tests look to be
passing on the 3.10-dev CI run for Cython. I think it only affected the
profiling feature on
Are you sure Cython is still broken? It looks like it was fixed back in May
(https://github.com/cython/cython/issues/4153) and all the tests look to be
passing on the 3.10-dev CI run for Cython. I think it only affected the
profiling feature on Cython (which most people will have turned off) so
I understood that _iterables_ are required to have an __iter__ method, not
iterators.
Therefore, are we simply discussing whether all iterators should be
iterable? At the moment the CPython implementation does't require that
AFAIK.
regards
Steve
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 8:39 PM Guido van Rossum
Hi,
The recent optimization work on ceval.c and frame objects introduced
regressions and the situation is stuck for 4 months (bpo-43760).
Right now, maybe the best would be to revert the 2 commits in the 3.10
branch, to get more time in Python 3.11 development cycle to solve
these issues.
(1) "
