On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 21:45, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 11:59 AM Barney Gale wrote:
>
>> Penny for your thoughts on those questions, Brett? Protocols are new to
>> me. I see importlib.abc.Traversable is a Protocol, and I'm giving PEP 544 a
>> read now.
>>
>
> Protocols wou
On 2022-02-11 06:14, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Sounds reasonable, but...
The implication of endorsing code like this is that *we cannot change
private API even in patch releases*, which I don't think is documented
anywhere, and might be a bit controversial.
I think we are still allowed to change
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2022-02-04 - 2022-02-11)
Python tracker at https://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open7178 (+34)
closed 51272 (+50)
total 58450 (+84)
Open issues w
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 2:15 PM Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 2/10/22 1:45 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> > Protocols would let folks rely on a common Path object API w/o having
> to require the object
> > come from pathlib itself or explicitly subclass something (which I
> admit would be rare, but
>
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 3:14 PM Petr Viktorin wrote:
> Sounds reasonable, but...
>
> The implication of endorsing code like this is that *we cannot change
> private API even in patch releases*, which I don't think is documented
> anywhere, and might be a bit controversial.
> (I'm still planning to
On 11. 02. 22 13:52, Victor Stinner wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:06 PM Petr Viktorin wrote:
Or will this send a message that core devs should co-maintain the project?
I personally wouldn't want to maintain it, but it it looks like there
are at least 3 maintainers who do.
I think that Nea
IMO we need to distinguish the public C API which should be as much
compatible as possible, target the oldest C standard, and the Python
internals can require a more recent C standard.
For example, today maybe it's reasonable to requires C99 for Include/
headers (public .h files) and support C11 f
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:06 PM Petr Viktorin wrote:
> Or will this send a message that core devs should co-maintain the project?
> I personally wouldn't want to maintain it, but it it looks like there
> are at least 3 maintainers who do.
I think that Neal provided a better answer than me :-) It
On 10. 02. 22 23:58, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
Would it make sense to move the pythoncapi_compat project under the
GitHub Python or PSF organization to make it more "official" and a
little bit more sustainable?
"The pythoncapi_compat project can be used to write a C extension
supporting a wide
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 6:31 PM Petr Viktorin wrote:
>
> >
> > I like it. I want to use anonymous union. It makes complex structure
> > like PyDictKeysObject simple a little.
> >
> > I confirmed that XLC supports it.
> > https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/xl-c-and-cpp-aix/13.1.3?topic=types-structures-un
10 matches
Mail list logo
