cd...@cam.ac.uk writes:
> I think that's exactly the problem with a lack of Python
> macros. The full quote, of course, goes: "There should be one-- and
> preferably only one --*obvious* way to do it."
You understand that the Zen is humorous? Most of the Zen, if taken
universally and seriousl
I think that's exactly the problem with a lack of Python macros. The full
quote, of course, goes: "There should be one-- and preferably only one
--*obvious* way to do it."
Often, there's a mathematical notation for something, and *this* is the only
obvious way to write anything out. But this do
Unfortunately, it's no longer being maintained.
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mai
Joshua Herman writes:
> I think that this would be better as a library in my opinion.
There's a third party package called MacroPy that provides macros,
although I haven't heard anything about it in a couple of years.
I seem to recall that it's a preprocessor that hooks into the import
system.
