Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace (round 3)

> From: Eric Snow > Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 11:02 PM > To: Émanuel Barry > Cc: Python-Dev > Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace > (round 3) > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Émanuel Barry <vgr...@live.ca> wrote:

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace (round 3)

> From: Eric Snow > Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 10:37 PM > To: Python-Dev; Guido van Rossum > Subject: [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace (round > 3) > The only change to the original proposal > has been that a manually set __definition_order__ must be a tuple of >

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 468

> From: zr...@fastmail.com > Subject: [Python-Dev] PEP 468 > > Is there any further thoughts on including this in 3.6? Similar to the > recent discussion on OrderedDict namespaces for metaclasses, this would > simplify / enable a number of type factory use cases where proper > metaclasses are

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP: Ordered Class Definition Namespace

> From: Eric Snow > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 2:52 PM > To: Émanuel Barry > Cc: Python-Dev > Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP: Ordered Class Definition Namespace > > "dunder" names (not just methods) will not be present in > __definition_order__. I'll add an

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP: Ordered Class Definition Namespace

> From: Eric Snow > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 1:52 PM > To: Python-Dev > Subject: [Python-Dev] PEP: Ordered Class Definition Namespace > > > Currently the namespace used during execution of a class body defaults > to dict. If the metaclass defines ``__prepare__()`` then the result of >

Re: [Python-Dev] Proper way to specify that a method is not defined for a type

> From: Ethan Furman > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 1:38 PM > To: Python Dev > Subject: [Python-Dev] Proper way to specify that a method is not defined for > a type (Just so everyone follows, this is a followup of http://bugs.python.org/issue27242 ) > For binary methods, such as __add__, either

Re: [Python-Dev] C99

> From: Python-Dev [mailto:python-dev- > bounces+vgr255=live...@python.org] On Behalf Of tritium- > l...@sdamon.com > Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2016 10:35 PM > To: 'Sturla Molden'; python-dev@python.org > Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] C99 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Python-Dev

Re: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict

> From Armin Rigo > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 4:42 PM > To: Victor Stinner > Cc: Python Dev > Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict > > Hi Victor, > > On 14 April 2016 at 17:19, Victor Stinner wrote: > > Each time a dictionary is