On 2011-03-22 11:19, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 3/21/2011 9:19 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Mar 21, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Daniel Stutzbach wrote:
>>
>>> Keeping the repository clean makes it easier to use a bisection search to
>>> hunt down the
On 2011-03-21 14:40, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:33:00 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
> wrote:
>> R. David Murray writes:
>> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:07:46 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
>> wrote:
>> > > No, at best the DVCS workflow forces the developer on a branch to
>> > >
On 2011-03-08 10:53, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
> On 2011-03-08 09:38, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> However, as Michael points out, you can have your tools generate the
>>> patch. For example, it shouldn't be too hard to add a dynamic patch
>>> generator
On 2011-03-08 09:38, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> However, as Michael points out, you can have your tools generate the
>> patch. For example, it shouldn't be too hard to add a dynamic patch
>> generator to Roundup (although I haven't thought about the UI or the
>> CPU burden).
>
> For Mercurial, t
On 2011-03-06 20:09, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> So, when I cloned, I should have done something like this:
>>>
>>> hg clone http://hg.python.org/cpython
>>> hg clone cpython 3.2
>>> hg clone 3.2 3.1
>>> hg clone cpython 2.7
>>> hg clone 2.7 2.6
>>> hg clone 2.6 2.5
>
On 2011-02-27 23:21, Neil Hodgson wrote:
> Adrian Buehlmann:
>
>> FWIW, we are very close to releasing TortoiseHg 2.0 (due March 1st),
>> which ported the current Gtk based TortoiseHg to Qt (although, it was
>> more like a rewrite :-).
>
>I hope this is going to
On 2011-02-27 16:35, Scott Dial wrote:
> On 2/27/2011 10:18 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> Well, chances are TortoiseHG comes with an UI to apply patches
>> (TortoiseSVN had one), so the command-line instructions may be of
>> little use to them.
>
> I don't believe TortoiseHG has such a feature (or
On 2011-02-26 23:26, Greg Ewing wrote:
> From: Antoine Pitrou
>> - a "branch" usually means a "named branch": a set of changesets
>> bearing the same label (e.g. "default"); that label is freely chosen
>> by the committer at any point, and enforces no topological
>> characteristic
>
> There
On 2011-02-27 01:50, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2011, at 11:45 PM, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
>
>> You'd have to take this up with Mercurial's BDFL Matt. He is a strong
>> advocate for teaching users to learn edit their .hg/hgrc files.
>
> Well, I guess it
On 2011-02-27 00:13, Dj Gilcrease wrote:
> Branch Management
> bookmarks
> http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/BookmarksExtension
Bookmarks will be in Mercurial core for Mercurial 1.8, which will be
released in a few days (March 1st). So, with 1.8 it's no longer needed
to enable this ext
On 2011-02-26 22:06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2011, at 02:05 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:08:47 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> $ cd py27 # now I want to synchronize
>>> $ hg pull -u ssh://h...@hg.python.org/cpython
>>>
>>> but I'm not going to remember that url e
On 2011-02-25 17:12, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2011, at 01:50 AM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2011, at 12:09 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>
>>> I think I would have liked the strategy of the PEP better (i.e.
>>> create clones for feature branches, rather than putting all
>>>
12 matches
Mail list logo