Armin Ronacher wrote:
> That's true, but by now there are countless of ordered dict
> implementations with a mostly-compatible interface and applications and
> libraries are using them already.
Even worse, most of them are slow, i.e. show a wrong algorithmic
complexity ...
> I have an example im
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 8/18/07, Alexander Schremmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> when I tried to use pdb, I spotted some kind of annoying behaviour of
>> pdb: for pdb.pm, it still uses sys.last_traceback which is set by code.py
>>
>> This renders the fun
Hi there,
when I tried to use pdb, I spotted some kind of annoying behaviour of pdb:
for pdb.pm, it still uses sys.last_traceback which is set by code.py
This renders the function unusable in non-interactive contexts ... I suggest
to change pdb.pm to use sys.exc_traceback instead. Any reasons not
Hi there,
when trying to use pdb, I spotted some kind of annoying behaviour of pdb:
for pdb.pm, it still uses sys.last_traceback which is set by code.py
This renders the function unusable in non-interactive contexts ... I suggest
to change pdb.pm to use sys.exc_traceback instead. Any reasons not
Hi python-dev,
MvL wrote:
>>> the on-disk repository is mighty big and it doesn't work very well
>>> on non-Linux systems (at least, not last I looked.)
Yes, mercurial or Bazaar do its job better on Windows etc. (and are
written in Python :-)
>> Not true. The on-disk repository is now one of t
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 20:45:05 -0700, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> There hasn't been much positive response (in the original thread or
> here). Given you forgot about it for over a year, how important can
> it be? :-)
For me it would be very important because I often wonder where the threads
are currently
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:00:09 +0200, Jan Claeys wrote:
> Op di, 13-06-2006 te 10:27 +0200, schreef Alexander Schremmer:
>> Bazaar-NG seems to reach limits already when working on
>> it's own code/repository.
>
> Canonical uses bzr to develop launchpad.net, which is a
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:31:14 +0200, Thomas Wouters wrote:
> I did partial imports into Mercurial and Bazaar-NG, but I got interrupted
> and couldn't draw any conclusions -- although from looking at the
> implementation, I don't think they'd scale very well at the moment (but that
> could probably
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 10:07:26 -0400, Martin Blais wrote:
> There are cases where you need N_() after initialization, so you need
> both, really. See the link I sent to Alex earlier (to the GNU manual
> example).
On the page you were referring to, I cannot find a particular use case that
does not w
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 20:35:51 -0400, Martin Blais wrote:
> This is pretty standard
> getttext stuff, if you used _() a lot I'm surprised you don't have a
> need for N_(), I always needed it when I used i18n (or maybe I
> misunderstood your question?).
Have you thought about simply writing _ = lambd
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:55:52 +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I can understand that position. The bugs they find include potential
> security flaws, for which exploits could be created if the results are
> freely available.
On the other hand, the exploit could be crafted based on reading the SV
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:57:59 -0500, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Think of it as "non-cooperative"
> multi-threading. While this is a somewhat rough approach, it is dramatically
> simpler than the alternatives (i.e. wrapping locks around every access to a
> resource or feeding all resource request
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:50:57 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Martin: There aren't any German docs, are there?
There is e.g. http://starship.python.net/~gherman/publications/tut-de/
Kind regards,
Alexander
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:29:27 -0800, Aahz wrote:
> DOS has some actual utility for low-grade devices and is overall a
> simpler platform to deliver code for. At the standard 18-month release
> cycle, it will be beginning of 2008 for the release of 2.6, which is ten
> years after Win98.
The last W
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:13:14 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
> If something like Fredrik's new doc system is adopted, it would be extremely
> convenient to refer someone to just
>
> docs.python.org/os.path.join
In fact, PHP does it like php.net/functionname which is even shorter, i.e.
they fallback t
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:23:39 +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> There are several issues involved in implementing such a patch, though.
>>> One is that you need to do it twice: once for Win9x, and once for
>>> NT+, because you have to use Unicode file names on one system, and
>>> ANSI file names
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 11:38:50 +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Somebody reported that it failed to update python24.dll in
> an update installation; not sure why this would be.
Because it was in use?
Kind regards,
Alexander
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 21:17:17 +0100, Thomas Heller wrote:
> The 2.4 python.org installer installs msvcr71.dll on the target system.
>
> If someone uses py2exe or a similar tool to create a frozen application,
> is he allowed to redistribute this msvcr71.dll to other users together
> with his appli
18 matches
Mail list logo
