Crutcher Dunnavant
On Jul 23, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 7/12/07, Daniel Stutzbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/11/07, Andy C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The good thing about this is that it's extremely simple -- basically
20 lines of C code to add a -z
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/crutcher%40gmail.com
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
littlelanguages.com
monket.samedi-studios.com
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman
() won't work on a list of classs, the way isinstance() does.
Is there any support for patches which fix A and/or B?
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
littlelanguages.com
monket.samedi-studios.com
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http
On 4/4/06, Greg Ewing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Crutcher Dunnavant wrote:
A) issubclass() throws a TypeError if the object being checked is not
a class, which seems very strange.
If I ever pass a non-class to issubclass() it's almost
certainly a bug in my code, and I'd want to know about
On 4/4/06, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/4/06, Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/4/06, Greg Ewing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Crutcher Dunnavant wrote:
A) issubclass() throws a TypeError if the object being checked is not
a class, which seems very
From discussion on python-3000, it occured to me that this shouldn't
break anything.
This patch adds a .format() method to the string and unicode types.
SF:1463370
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
littlelanguages.com
monket.samedi-studios.com
Yep, moved this there.
On 4/2/06, Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006, Crutcher Dunnavant wrote:
But I have some questions about this for python 3000.
Please use the python-3000 list for questions like this.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * http
to __rmod__?
* time: %s(time.ctime()) == time: %s % time.ctime()
* %(a)s %(b)s(a=1, b=2) == %(a)s %(b)s % {'a'=1, 'b'=2}
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
littlelanguages.com
monket.samedi-studios.com
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/crutcher%40gmail.com
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
littlelanguages.com
monket.samedi-studios.com
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev
://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/crutcher%40gmail.com
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
littlelanguages.com
monket.samedi-studios.com
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
, Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to chime in so late, but why are we setting a value when the key
isn't defined?
It seems there are many situations where you want:
a) default values, and
b) the ability to determine if a value was defined.
There are many times that I want
in two ways:
1) dict.get doesn't work for object dicts or in exec/eval contexts, and
2) dict.get requires me to generate the default value even if I'm not
going to use it, a process which may be expensive.
On 2/20/06, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Crutcher Dunnavant
:
raise cmdloop.HaltLoop
HelloGoodbye().runLoop()
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
littlelanguages.com
monket.samedi-studios.com
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http
oops, error in the example: s/commandLoop/CommandLoop/g
On 2/19/06, Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is something I've been working on for a bit, and I think it is
more or less ready to bring up on this list. I'd like to add a module
(though probably not for 2.5).
Before you
Yes, I know. Hence this not being a patch.
This is really meant to be a compelling alternative to cmd.Cmd, and as
such I'm trying to get some discussion about it.
On 2/19/06, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/19/06, Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is something I've
Whoa, thanks. Incorporated the suggestions to the code.
On 2/19/06, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Crutcher Dunnavant]
Anyway, I'm looking for feedback, feature requests before starting the
submission process.
With respect to the API, the examples tend to be visually dominated
s/catch modules/catch exceptions/g
On 2/19/06, Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whoa, thanks. Incorporated the suggestions to the code.
On 2/19/06, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Crutcher Dunnavant]
Anyway, I'm looking for feedback, feature requests before starting
be of limited
utility, versus throwing errors if the user specified something
unsupported.
Raymond
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
littlelanguages.com
monket.samedi-studios.com
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http
-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/crutcher%40gmail.com
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
littlelanguages.com
monket.samedi-studios.com
. There are just too many places where you are going to get
name clashes, where something which is _obvious_ in one context will
have a different ( and _obvious_ ) meaning in another. Lets just keep
the namespaces clean, and not worry about inter-module conflicts.
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED
,
Michael
On 2/14/06, Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/12/06, Alan Gauld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However I do dislike the name nice() - there is already a nice() in the
os module with a fairly well understood function. But I'm sure some
Presumably it would be located
decorator is impossible...
regards,
Georg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/crutcher%40gmail.com
--
Crutcher
,
# but doesn't hit the recursion limit.
@tail_call_optimized
def fib(i, current = 0, next = 1):
if i == 0:
return current
else:
return fib(i - 1, next, current + next)
print fib(1)
# also prints a big number,
# but doesn't hit the recursion limit.
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL
/python-dev/crutcher%40gmail.com
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
monket.samedi-studios.com
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/crutcher%40gmail.com
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
monket.samedi-studios.com
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
I've significantly re-worked the patch to permit globals to be
arbitrary mappings.
The regression tests continue to all pass.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1402289group_id=5470atid=305470
On 1/24/06, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Crutcher Dunnavant wrote
:
Crutcher Dunnavant wrote:
I sorta disagree about it not being broken. Adding a feature which
works for eval but not for exec seems pretty broken.
You seem to have a different notion of to be broken, then.
Python is broken, if and only if
- the interpreter crashes, for any Python input
(the given use cases, more detailed timings, and a close reading of the
code).
If accepted, it will be for Py2.5, as it is a new feature. There is
nothing broken about the existing eval() version, it just doesn't apply
as broadly as you would have liked.
Raymond
--
Crutcher Dunnavant
Is there any objection to this patch? Any support?
On 1/10/06, Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1402289
On 1/10/06, Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006, Crutcher Dunnavant wrote:
There is an inconsistancy in the way that dictionary subclasses behave
when
. The attached patch (and
unittest!) addresses this issue.
I'm pretty sure we keep the fast path in this.
--
Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
monket.samedi-studios.com
dictsubclassexec.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python
Sorry, sent a patch without an intro.
My name is Crutcher Dunnavant
I'm working on a doctorate in computer science (in modeling language practises).
Before I got my master's degree, I used to work for Red Hat in North Carolina as
an OS developer, and I now work in the San Fransisco Bay Area
1402289
On 1/10/06, Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006, Crutcher Dunnavant wrote:
There is an inconsistancy in the way that dictionary subclasses behave
when they are used as as namespaces in execs.
Basically, while python 2.4 permits the usage of dictionary subclasses
ld.del_notify_func = None
self.assert_(ld['b'] == 1)
self.assert_('a' in ll)
self.assert_('a' in gl)
def test_main():
test_support.run_unittest(
DictSubclassExecTest,
)
if __name__ == __main__:
test_main()
On 1/10/06, Crutcher Dunnavant [EMAIL
33 matches
Mail list logo
