Ahh ... I see. I should have done a bit more digging to find where the
standard tests were.
I created a few new tests that could be included in that test suite --
see the attached file. Do you think that this would be sufficient?
- Dan
Bill Janssen wrote:
Dan Mahn wrote:
Yes, that
I submitted an explanation of this and my proposed modification as issue
5468.
http://bugs.python.org/issue5468
- Dan
Bill Janssen wrote:
Aahz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009, Dan Mahn wrote:
After a harder look, I concluded there was a bit more work to be done,
but still very basic
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009, Dan Mahn wrote:
After a harder look, I concluded there was a bit more work to be done,
but still very basic modifications.
Attached is a version of urlencode() which seems to make the most sense
to me.
I wonder how I could officially propose at leas
wrote:
Bill Janssen wrote:
Dan Mahn wrote:
3) Regarding the following code fragment in urlencode():
k = quote_plus(str(k))
if isinstance(v, str):
v = quote_plus(v)
l.append(k + '=' + v)
elif isinsta
Bill Janssen wrote:
Bill Janssen wrote:
Dan Mahn wrote:
3) Regarding the following code fragment in urlencode():
k = quote_plus(str(k))
if isinstance(v, str):
v = quote_plus(v)
l.append(k + '=
Hi. I've been using Py3K successfully for a while now, and have some
questions about urlencode().
1) The docs mention that items sent to urlencode() are quoted using
quote_plus(). However, instances of type "bytes" are not handled like
they are with quote_plus() because urlencode() converts
