On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 8:22 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>
> For me a major annoyance is the empty page with two links on wiki.python.org
> While it allows to tell new people that there is also a Jython wiki,
> my vision that it should be instead be oriented on existing
> contributors immediately
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
> The hard part is to know *when* to look. As you might have noticed, the
> Python test suite does not run in ten seconds, especially on some of the
> buildbots -- it can take 1-2 there to complete. So if you look too soon,
> you won't see a
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Are the bug tracker and meta-tracker down for anyone else, or is it just me?
>
It is down for me as well. It appears to be accepting the connection
and then just doesn't return any content.
--
David
blog: http://www.traceback.org
twitter: ht
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:25 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> I planned to publish this proposal when it is finally ready and tested
> with an assumption that Subversion repository will be online and
> up-to-date after Mercurial migration. But recent threads showed that
> currently there is no tested
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Xavier Morel wrote:
> On 8 Mar 2010, at 16:53 , David Stanek wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Steven Bethard
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In argparse, unlike optparse, actions are actually defined by objects
>>>
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Steven Bethard
wrote:
>
> In argparse, unlike optparse, actions are actually defined by objects
> with a particular API, and the string is just a shorthand for
> referring to that. So:
>
> parser.add_argument ('--plot', action='store_true')
>
> is equivalent to:
>
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:02 AM, David Stanek
> wrote:
> > Where is the code for PyPi? I took a quick look and didn't turn up
> anything.
>
> https://svn.python.org/packages/trunk/pypi/
>
> I'
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:44:32 pm Ludvig Ericson wrote:
> >> Why are there comments on PyPI? Moreso, why are there comments which
> >> I cannot control as a package author on my ver
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> On May 19, 2009, at 10:21 PM, David Stanek wrote:
>
>>
>> It seems that using a technique similar to dependency injection could
>> provide some value. DI allows implementations conforming to some
>> interf
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2009/5/19 Michael Foord :
>> I have IronPython specific versions of several of these functions which use
>> .NET reflection and inspect could fallback to if sys.platform == 'cli'.
>> Would it be ok for me to add these to the inspect modul
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Tarek Ziadé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What about having two level of devs ?
>
> + core developers
> + standard library developers
>
I was also thinking about two levels of developers, but structured a
little differently. We have the same core developers with
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Victor Stinner
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I would like to know if a Python security team does exist. I sent an email
>> about an imageop issue, and I didn't get any answer. Later I le
nit__ module? Create an inet package
and having the __init__ module pull whatever it wanted into it's own
namespace.
It would be nice to then use warnings to show deprecation messages
when the old import is used (import url instead of import inet.url),
but I don't think that is quite so easy
13 matches
Mail list logo