On 7/21/21 5:33 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I don't have any substantive comments on what you're proposing (aside
> from "Yes, that sounds reasonable to me"), so my comments below are
> just some minor suggested clarifications for the PEP text.
Thanks, PEP updated.
--
~Ethan~
Greetings!
A question [1] has arisen about the viability of `random.SystemRandom` in Pythons before and after the secrets module
was introduced (3.5 I think) -- specifically
does it give independent and uniform discrete distribution for
cryptographic purposes across CPython 3.x version
On 12/7/20 11:29 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
After much deliberation, the 2020 SC will be making a recommendation to the 2021 SC to accept PEP 634 (although this was
not a unanimous decision).
This seems very odd. The Steering Council is elected to make decisions, but it feels like the current SC
