> > Barry Warsaw wrote: > >>On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 19:19 +0100, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: >> >> >> >>>It stopped counting builds on Windows quite some time ago; perhaps it >>>is best to drop the build number entirely? >> >> >>I think so, because it doesn't really convey anything useful. >> > > I thought it was more succinct than the build-date when rebuilding > continuously during testing, but I guess I'm only -0 on dropping it.
It's also the only thing that identifes the revision/build precisely, allowing reversion to a known state. John -- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
