On 2005-11-16, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josiah Carlson wrote:
>>I seemed to have misunderstood the discussion. Was the original user
>>accessing and saving copies of many millions of these doubles?
>>
> He *was* accessing them (therefore generating a call to an array-scalar
On 2005-09-01, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for functions without '()'s. (Just a thought) You could use '<<' or
> '<<<' (or other symbol) as a way to move data between objects.
>
> ui.write <<< 'Hello World/n' # ui.write('Hello World/n')
>
> ui.writeln <<< counter
On 2005-08-30, Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2005 11:26, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>> > My major issue is with the names - partition() doesn't sound right to
>> > me.
>>
>> FWIW, I am VERY happy with the name partition().
>
> I'm +1 on the functionality, and +1 o
On 2005-08-26, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can str.find be listed in PEP 3000 (under builtins) for removal?
> Would anyone really object?
>
With all the discussion, I think you guys should realize that the
find/index method are actually convenient function which do 2 things in
one cal
