Re: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda

2006-02-11 Thread Keith Dart
a Print function, when it is installed. http://svn.dartworks.biz/svn/repos/pynms/trunk/lib/nmsbuiltins.py -- -- ~~~~~ Keith Dart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> public key: ID: 19017044 <

Re: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda

2006-02-10 Thread Keith Dart
derision, one has to wonder why? Docile little lambdas, so innocent and pure Only wants to function with finality and closure. Cute little lambdas, they really are so sweet When ingested by a Python they make a tasty treat. -- -- ~~

Re: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda

2006-02-08 Thread Keith Dart
Guido van Rossum wrote the following on 2006-02-08 at 10:07 PST: === > Note that I'm not participating in any attempts to "improve" lambda. === FWIW, I like lambda. No need to change it. Thank you. -- -- ~~~~~

Re: [Python-Dev] threadsafe patch for asynchat

2006-02-08 Thread Keith Dart
n the core library and what is not will become moot. Being a Gentoo Linux user I already enjoy having many modules available, with automatic dependency installation, on demand. So the idea of "core" library is already blurred for me. -- -- ~~

Re: [Python-Dev] Is PEP 237 final -- Unifying Long Integers and Integers

2005-06-21 Thread Keith Dart
ional, but if speed becomes a problem then this might be useful. -- -- ~~~~~ Keith Dart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> public key: ID: F3D288E4 = ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org

Re: [Python-Dev] Is PEP 237 final -- Unifying Long Integers and Integers

2005-06-21 Thread Keith Dart
ck it at conversion time, but that would mean extra Python bytecode. It seems you think this is a special case, but I think Python may be used as a "glue language" fairly often, and some

Re: [Python-Dev] Is PEP 237 final -- Unifying Long Integers and Integers

2005-06-20 Thread Keith Dart
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Keith Dart wrote: > But then I wouldn't know if it overflowed 32 bits. In my usage, the > integer will be translated to an unsigned (32 bit) integer in another > system (SNMP). I want to know if it will fit, and I want to know early if > there will be a pro

Re: [Python-Dev] Is PEP 237 final -- Unifying Long Integers and Integers

2005-06-20 Thread Keith Dart
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Guido van Rossum wrote: > [Keith Dart] >> In SNMP, for example, a Counter32 is basically an unsigned int, defined >> as "IMPLICIT INTEGER (0..4294967295)". One cannot efficiently translate >> and use that type in native Python. Currently, I hav

Re: [Python-Dev] Is PEP 237 final -- Unifying Long Integers and Integers

2005-06-19 Thread Keith Dart
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Josiah Carlson wrote: > > Keith Dart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Therefore, I would like to ask here if anyone has already started >> something like this? If not, I will go ahead and do it (if I have time). > > If all you need to do is

Re: [Python-Dev] Is PEP 237 final -- Unifying Long Integers and Integers

2005-06-19 Thread Keith Dart
nd I will add it to my existing collection of Python extensions. Therefore, I would like to ask here if anyone has already started something like this? If not, I will go ahead and do it (if I have time). -- -- ~~

Re: [Python-Dev] Is PEP 237 final -- Unifying Long Integers and Integers

2005-06-18 Thread Keith Dart
ith hex values and shifts. Now, with the integer unification, how is ioctl() supposed to work? I cannot figure out how to make it work in this case. I suppose the best thing is to introduce an "unsignedint" type for this purpose. As it is right now, I cannot use 2.4 at all. -- -- ~~

Re: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: 2.4 news reaches interesting places

2004-12-15 Thread Keith Dart
rovided some space for me. Perhaps they will be glad to host the main Python site, as well? -- \/ \/ (O O) -- oOOo~(_)~oOOo-------- Keith Dart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> vcard: <http://www

Re: [Python-Dev] PyOS_InputHook enhancement proposal

2004-12-09 Thread Keith Dart
forge. -- \/ \/ (O O) -- oOOo~(_)~oOOo Keith Dart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> vcard: <http://www.kdart.com/~kdart/kdart.vcf> public key: ID: F3D288E4 URL: <http://www.kdart.c