Hello,
Le 03/03/2017 à 15:37, Louis Bouchard a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Le 03/03/2017 à 15:31, Victor Stinner a écrit :
>>> Out of curiosity, I ran the set of benchmarks in two LXC containers running
>>> centos7 (2.7.5 + gcc 4.8.5) and Fedora 25 (2.7.13 + gcc 6.3.x). The
1pKCOpyu4HUyw9YtJugn6jzVGa_zeDmBVNzqmXHtM6gM/edit#gid=1548436297
Third column is the ?.??x value that you are looking for, taken directly out of
the 'pyperformance analyze' results.
I didn't know about the new options, I'll give it a spin & see if I can get a
better format.
Ki
I disabled PGO on
2.7.6+gcc4.8 (Trusty). This made the 2.7.6+gcc4.8 (Trusty) interpreter to become
slower than the Xenial reference.
Unfortunately, I cannot redeploy my server on RHEL or Fedora at the moment so
this is as far as I can go.
Kind regards,
...Louis
--
Louis Bouchard
Software engi
e able to confirm a similar
trend in the results before going forward with tests on baremetal.
> Cheers,
> Nick.
>
Thanks,
...Louis
--
Louis Bouchard
Software engineer, Cloud & Sustaining eng.
Canonical Ltd
Ubuntu developer Debian Maintainer
GPG : 429D 7A3B DD05 B
Hello,
Le 01/03/2017 à 20:40, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 20:24:03 +0100
> Louis Bouchard wrote:
>>
>> Indeed, this is something that is in the history of the LP bug so here is the
>> URL where those comparison can be found :
>>
>> ht
e found :
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MyNBPVZlBeic1OLqVKe_bcPk2deO_pQs9trIfOFefM0/edit#gid=2034603487
Hope it can help,
Kind regards,
...Louis
--
Louis Bouchard
Software engineer, Cloud & Sustaining eng.
Canonical Ltd
Ubuntu developer Debian Maintainer
G
