On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> "Martin v. Löwis" writes:
>
>> > Why can't we just disable it until we can come up with a better
>> > system that finds a balance between the rights of maintainers, and
>> > those of the user?
>>
>> Because I want to wait for the outcome of th
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
...
> Frankly, I agree with him. As implemented, I *and others* think this
> is broken. I've taken the stance of not publishing things to PyPi
> until A> I find the time to contribute to make it better or B> It
> changes.
Ditto, but maybe for d
[ I'm posting this comment in reply to seeing this thread:
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel/11359
Which has been reposted around - and I've read that thread. I lurk on
this list, in case anything comes up that I'd hope to be able to say
something useful to. I don't kn
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Michael Sparks gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> I know it's the upteen-thousandth time it's been discussed, but
>> removal of the GIL in 3.x would probably be pretty big carrots for
>> some. I know th
On Sunday 11 October 2009 21:00:41 Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> with all the
> dependency-migration issues 3.x could definitely use some carrots.
..
> everybody's favorate bugaboo, multicore parallelism.
I know it's the upteen-thousandth time it's been discussed, but
removal of the GIL in 3.x would pr
On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:40, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Teaching Python-based extraction tools about it isn't hard, just make
> sure that you slurp in the whole argument, and eval it.
We generate our component documentation based on going through the AST
generated by compiler.ast, finding doc
process boundaries though, but that's for the system composer
to deal with, not the components).
Regards,
Michael.
--
Michael Sparks, Senior R&D Engineer, Digital Media Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://kamaelia.sourceforge.net/
British Broadcasting Corporation, Research and Development
Kingswoo
On Saturday 08 October 2005 04:05, Josiah Carlson wrote:
[ simplistic, informal benchmark of a test optimised versioned of the system,
based on bouncing scaing rotating sprites around the screen. ]
> Single process? Multi-process single machine? Multiprocess multiple
> machine?
SIngle process,
On Thursday 06 October 2005 21:06, Bruce Eckel wrote:
> So yes indeed, this is quite high on my list to research. Looks like
> people there have been doing some interesting work.
>
> Right now I'm just trying to cast a net, so that people can put in
> ideas, for when the Java book is done and I can
r.
BTW, I hope it's clear that I'm not saying concurrency is easy per se (noting
your previous post ;-) but rather than it /should/ be made as simple as is
humanly possible.
Thanks!
Michael.
--
Michael Sparks, Senior R&D Engineer, Digital Media Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://kamae
d for a "message passing"/"tuple space"/"IPC" library.
Sounds interesting. I'll try and find some time to have a look and have a
play. FWIW, we're also missing a prioritisation mechanism right now. Though
currently I have SImon Wittber's latest re
a linda approach - since
they're orthoganal approaches.
Best Regards,
Michael.
--
Michael Sparks, Senior R&D Engineer, Digital Media Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://kamaelia.sourceforge.net/
British Broadcasting Corporation, Research and Development
Kingswood Warren, Surrey KT20 6NP
T
cient.
However, the way we're beginning to refer to the project is to refer to
just the component aspect rather than concurrency - for one simple
reason - we're getting to stage where we can ignore /most/ concurrency
issues(not all).
If you have any time for feed
rl.com/dp8n7
(This really feels like this more of a comp.lang.python discussion really
though, because AFAICT, python already has everything we need for this.
I might revisit that thought when we've looked at shared memory issues
though. IMHO though that would be largely stuff for the standa
On Friday 30 September 2005 22:13, Michael Sparks (home address) wrote:
> I wrote a white paper based on my Python UK talk, which is here:
> * http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/whp/whp11.shtml
Oops that URL isn't right. It should be:
* http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/whp/whp113.s
hedskin will mitigate /our/
need to do that translation manually :-)
If anyone's interested further, I'm happy to talk more (I'm going to Euro
OSCON is anyone wants to discuss this there), but this feels like spamming
the list so I'll leave things at that.
However, so far we
ng.python
instead.
Michael.
--
Michael Sparks, Senior R&D Engineer, Digital Media Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://kamaelia.sourceforge.net/
British Broadcasting Corporation, Research and Development
Kingswood Warren, Surrey KT20 6NP
This e-mail may contain personal views which are not the vie
er ?
(Assumption: That the word guarantee in this case matches that of the intent)
If you just call the with statement a "resource manager" I suspect that people
will more /naturally/ think just along the idea of resources, rather than
also along the lines of things that need guara
hy) that you revisit
greenlets - they probably do what you want.
Mainly replying to say "-1",
Best Regards,
Michael.
--
Michael Sparks, Senior R&D Engineer, Digital Media Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://kamaelia.sourceforge.net/
British Broadcasting Corporation, Research and Develo
ps if you're taking the approach for generator
composition if you're using twisted.flow (though I'll defer a good example
for that to someone else since although I've been asked for a comparison in
the past, I don't think I'm sufficiently twisted to do so!).
Michael.
If you need a volunteer to code this - should it go through, I'm willing to
have a go at this. (I can't do this though for 3 weeks or so though due to a
crunch at work, and I might be in over my head in offering this.)
Michael.
--
Michael Sparks, Senior R&D Engineer, Digit
xpr_33.p
* L-System definition: http://www.cerenity.org/SWP/progs/expr_34.p
* SML-like: http://www.cerenity.org/SWP/progs/expr_35.p
* Amiga E/Algol like: http://www.cerenity.org/SWP/progs/expr_37.p
Needs the modified version of PLY installed first, and the tests can be run
using
22 matches
Mail list logo
