[Python-Dev] Re: RFC on Callable Type Syntax

pt., 8 paź 2021 o 04:48 S Pradeep Kumar napisał(a): > ... > Note that we considered and rejected using a full def-signature syntax like > > (record: PurchaseRecord, permissions: List[AuthPermission], /) -> > FormattedItem > > because it would be more verbose for common cases and could

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 642 v2: Explicit constraint patterns *without* question marks in the syntax

czw., 12 lis 2020 o 19:41 Paul Sokolovsky napisał(a): > > Hello, > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:55:10 -0800 > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > The position of PEP 622/634/535/636 authors is clear: we see this as a > > necessary feature to support using enums (e.g. Color.RED) or constants > > defined in

Re: [Python-Dev] Bug in the DELETE statement in sqlite3 module

This is not a bug, this is correct behavior of any sql database. 2016-06-15 8:40 GMT+02:00 ninostephen mathew : > Respected Developer(s), > while writing a database module for one of my applications in python I > encountered something interesting. I had a username and password

Re: [Python-Dev] Add a transformdict to collections

2013/9/12 Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us: On 09/11/2013 02:39 PM, Tim Delaney wrote: I would think that retrieving the keys from the dict would return the transformed keys (I'd call them canonical keys). The more I think about this the more I agree. A canonicaldict with a key function

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 435: pickling enums created with the functional API

2013/5/7 Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com: 4) Using _getframe(N) here seems like an overkill to me. What we really need is just the module in which the current execution currently is (i.e. the metaclass's __new__ in our case). Would it make sense to add a new function somewhere in the stdlib of

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 435: pickling enums created with the functional API

2013/5/7 Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us: On 05/07/2013 07:48 AM, Piotr Duda wrote: What about adding simple syntax (I proposed this earlier, but no one commented) that take care of assigning name and module, something like: def name = expression which would be rough equivalent

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 435: pickling enums created with the functional API

2013/5/7 Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us: On 05/07/2013 08:01 AM, Piotr Duda wrote: 2013/5/7 Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us: On 05/07/2013 07:48 AM, Piotr Duda wrote: What about adding simple syntax (I proposed this earlier, but no one commented) that take care of assigning name

Re: [Python-Dev] PyPy, Jython, IronPython: Enum convenience function and pickleablity

2013/5/3 Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org: On May 03, 2013, at 07:40 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: The problem is that this is not an expression, it is a statement. The advantage of the convenience function is not just that it is shorter, but that it is an expression. Exactly right, but let's stop

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 435 -- Adding an Enum type to the Python standard library

2013/4/26 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote: On Apr 25, 2013, at 03:19 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: Clearly this is a trick question. :-) A bit, yes. :) I was told when this was brought up previously (a week ago?) that