1. Semantic operator overloading in generic contexts is very different from
this use case. It's surrounded by a clear context.
2. Python programmer intuition varies across python programmers, and I would
find it hella unintuitive if I had to explicitly capture every variable. I just
want to writ
Hi Rob, thank you! :)
I think I understand the point, but I still don't agree with it. I find it hard
to come up with a concrete use case where you would like to name a parameter
without specifying it. Suppose we want
case Status(user, n_messages, replies, unicode:=_)
Then it might be a little us
I'm very new to this mailing list so I'm not sure it's my place to email, but
I'd like to weigh in and maybe it will be useful. If not you can always ignore
;)
I think adding the Walrus operator is trying to solve a problem that doesn't
exist. Compare the example from the PEP:
def make_point_3d
