Fair enough.
Robin
On 30/11/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robin Bryce schrieb:
> > Yes, especially with the regard to the level you pitch for LSB. I
> > would go as far as to say that if this "contract in spirit" is broken
> >
On 28/11/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I personally agree that "Linux standards" should specify a standard
> layout for a Python installation, and that it should be the one that
> "make install" generates (perhaps after "make install" is adjusted).
> Whether or not it is the *L
> Actually, I meant that (among other things) it should be clarified that
> it's alright to e.g. put .pyc and data files inside Python library
> directories, and NOT okay to split them up.
Phillip, Just to be clear: I understand you are not in favour of
re-packaging data from python projects (proj
This has an sf number now #1537167, and hopefully a clearer
explanation of what I think the problem is. This is not a duplicate of
the earlier "PEP 302 Fix" thread.
Thanks,
Robin
On 07/08/06, Robin Bryce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Appologies for the lack of
Hi,
Appologies for the lack of an sf#. I tried to submit this there but
couldn't. (sf is logging me out each time I visit a new page and it is
refusing my attempt to post anonymously).
Python 2.5b3 (trunk:51136M, Aug 7 2006, 10:48:15)
[GCC 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5)] on linux2
The need for
outbound x = 1
x = 2
evaluating using Jeremy Hilton's' list:
1. is a real word
2. For me - in python - it would mean: Is found in 'outer' scope and
is already bound.
And the literal meaning of 'outbound 'headed away' [1] is pretty
darn close to what I mean when I spell the usual mutables kluge.
> But what's the point? We have until Python 3000 anyway.
Ah, my mistake. In my enthusiasm, I foolishly got the time frames of
peps 3103 & 275 mixed up.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
U
> PEP 3103, When to Freeze the Dispatch Dict/Option 1
2 things resonated with me for Raymond's proposal and the follow up:
- It seemed agnostic to almost all of the independently contentious issues.
- "is defined tightly enough to allow room for growth and elaboration over
time" [Raymond]. In par
