on 2009-03-27 05:17 P.J. Eby said the following:
At 04:08 PM 3/27/2009 +1300, Greg Ewing wrote:
You can't expect to improve something like that by
stuffing yield-from into the existing framework, because
the point of yield-from is to render the framework
itself unnecessary.
But it doesn't.
on 31.03.2007 22:39 Guido van Rossum said the following:
If you ask me, having it hosted by Trent is probably more helpful for
its popularity than putting it in the Python source distro; the Tools
directory is mostly a poorly-maintained collection of trivia I wrote
many years ago that is now
on 13.07.2006 10:26 Mike Brown said the following:
Stefan Rank wrote:
on 12.07.2006 07:53 Martin v. Löwis said the following:
Anthony Baxter wrote:
The right thing to do is IRIs.
For 2.5, should we at least detect that it's unicode and raise a
useful error?
That can certainly be done
on 12.07.2006 07:53 Martin v. Löwis said the following:
Anthony Baxter wrote:
The right thing to do is IRIs.
For 2.5, should we at least detect that it's unicode and raise a
useful error?
That can certainly be done, sure.
Martin
That would be great.
And I agree that updating
Hi,
urllib.quote fails on unicode strings and in an unhelpful way::
Python 2.4.3 (#69, Mar 29 2006, 17:35:34) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)]
on win32
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
import urllib
urllib.quote('a\xf1a')
'a%F1a'
on 04.05.2006 16:18 Paul Moore said the following:
On 5/4/06, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My inclination was to have a PlatformPath subclass that accepted 'os', 'sep'
and 'extsep' keyword arguments to the constructor, and provided the
appropriate 'sep' and 'extsep' attributes
on 16.02.2006 06:59 Alex Martelli said the following:
On Feb 15, 2006, at 9:51 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 09:17 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Regarding open vs. opentext, I'm still not sure. I don't want to
generalize from the openbytes precedent to openstr or
on 03.02.2006 00:16 Delaney, Timothy (Tim) said the following:
Andrew Koenig wrote:
I definately agree with the 0c664 octal literal. Seems rather more
intuitive.
I still prefer 8r664.
The more I look at this, the worse it gets. Something beginning with
zero (like 0xFF, 0c664) immediately
on 27.01.2006 11:16 Paul Moore said the following:
[...]
Arguably, Path objects should always maintain an absolute path - there
should be no such thing as a relative Path. So you would have
you realise that one might need and/or want to represent a relative path?
Absolutely. But not a Path
on 26.01.2006 14:15 Paul Moore said the following:
[snip]
Also note that my example Path(C:, Windows, System32) above is
an *absolute* path on Windows. But a relative (albeit stupidly-named
:-)) path on Unix. How would that be handled?
wrong, Path(C:, Windows, System32) is a relative path on
on 18.10.2005 19:17 Antoine Pitrou said the following:
What would this mythical block statement look like that would make
properties easier to write than the above late-binding or the subclass
Property recipe?
I suppose something like:
class C(object):
x = prop:
Yay for
11 matches
Mail list logo
