On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 14:28, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:31:45 -0500
> Tom Browder wrote:
>>
>> Can anyone explain the two different "default" installations I got?
>>
>> It seems to me I should force the Ubuntu-style installation b
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 13:05, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 9/20/2010 10:31 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> ...
>>
>> I see that the configure file has some architecture choices
>> (--with-universal-archs=ARCH) but no explanation about the
>> consequences.
>>
>> Can
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 13:05, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 9/20/2010 10:31 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> ...
>>
>> I see that the configure file has some architecture choices
>> (--with-universal-archs=ARCH) but no explanation about the
>> consequences.
>>
>> Can
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:12, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
>
> On 20 Sep, 2010,at 04:31 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
>
> Continuing on with investigating Python 2.7 build problems, one
> problem I just discovered is a different installation on one 64-bit
> system (Debian Lenny) v
Continuing on with investigating Python 2.7 build problems, one
problem I just discovered is a different installation on one 64-bit
system (Debian Lenny) versus another (Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS).
I used gcc-4.5.1 on both systems, with no *PY* environment variables set.
On Debian I got two directories:
USAOn Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 16:36, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2010 23:10:22, Tom Browder a écrit :
>> I'm attempting to file a bug but keep getting:
>
> File another bug about this bug!
I did, and eventually discovered the problem: I tried to "nosy"
I'm attempting to file a bug but keep getting:
An error has occurred
A problem was encountered processing your request. The tracker
maintainers have been notified of the problem.
-Tom
Thomas M. Browder, Jr.
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
Python-Dev mailin
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 14:36, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2010, at 01:41 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
>
>>I am trying to rebujild the 2.7 maintenance branch and get this error
>>on Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS:
>
> I just tried this on my vanilla 10.04.1 system. I checked o
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 13:48, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Go ahead and file the bug, but chances are that some other installed
> Python is executing the code and picking up the .pyc files which have
> bytecode new to Python 2.7.
But isn't that a problem with the build system? It seems to me it
should
I am trying to rebujild the 2.7 maintenance branch and get this error
on Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS:
XXX lineno: 743, opcode: 0
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/src/python-2.7-maint-svn/Lib/site.py", line 62, in
import os
File "/usr/local/src/python-2.7-maint-svn/Lib/os.py", line
10 matches
Mail list logo