On Sat, Jul 23, 2022, 19:33 Steven Barker wrote:
> So to give my final takeaway: It might be possible for Discourse to
> replace Python-dev, even for those who wish to get their messages by email.
> But the user experience of signing up is vastly worse, and will need much
> more than a single par
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 1:31 PM Nathan Cook wrote:
> Please make https://peps.python.org/ more responsive to various form factors
>
> See attached screenshot from Chrome version 99.0.4844.58 on my Pixel 3aXL
> running Android 12
I can't reproduce this without zooming in. If you're still convinc
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 11:29 AM Matti Picus wrote:
> You may want to try the experiments in a private repo under your username
> rather than under the python organization. I think this will prevent anyone
> except you from getting notified. You could even go further and set up a
> dummy bpo-mi
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:29 PM Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
> * FWIW, I've closely monitored the bug tracker daily for almost two decades.
> We almost never get a user complaint that the tutorial is too advanced. For
> the most part, it has long been of good service to users. Almost certainly
>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 9:36 AM Peter Donis wrote:
> Is there any update on this? I have put the setup/teardown code in a context
> manager as Zach recommended. The setup/teardown code covers everything that
> could possibly be mutated by the test. It's probably not the most elegant way
> to do
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 9:59 PM Guido van Rossum wrote:
> The Pull Request title is "Fix newline conversion when doctest.testfile loads
> from a package whose loader has a get_data method", it looks relatively
> straightforward and thorough.
I've submitted a review; the actual code change is ve
Hi all,
The database backing buildbot.python.org has been reset in order to
clean out old workers and builders, and to allow some relationships to
be created properly to allow future cleanups without resetting
everything. This does unfortunately mean that old links are going to
be broken, includi
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 1:58 PM Ethan Furman wrote:
> Will there be a time delay between the final tagging and the deletion so any
> who would like the repo in its final state can clone it at that point?
No need; you can try this with any currently closed branch like 3.3:
`git checkout -B 3.3 re
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:44 AM Steve Dower wrote:
> That said, I'd love to have a context manager that we can use to make
> this easier. Really, none of us should be having to decide "how am I
> going to use a temporary location on the file system in my test",
> because we should have one obviou
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:37 PM Steve Dower wrote:
> I also haven't reviewed the changes yet, but provided nobody is strongly
> opposed to taking on a supported platform (without additional releases
> on python.org), I expect I'll do a big part of the reviewing then.
I'm all for the first two chan
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 4:39 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> What I did (*) is different: I asked to mark Davin inactive and to stop
> auto-assigning him on bug tracker issues. Davin was /still/ listed in
> the experts list, along with me and others. IOW, there was no "editing
> out".
Auto-assignment
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:17 AM Steve Dower wrote:
> Also for not submitting custom builds to all the buildbots (Can we still do
> that? I'm not seeing any UI right now... I did run a number of test
> release builds on the release machine, so I knew that was going to be okay.)
The UX is not great,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:09 AM VanL wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking into an issue associated with the wininst-*.exe files in the
> distutils/command subdirectory. It looks like these are the executable stubs
> used to create self-extracting zips for installation - but I am not 100%
> sure. I
It is still up to the core dev to set the message properly, but the HTML
comments are invisible on GitHub until you edit the message. That bug is
now fixed, though; HTML comments are stripped from the message before
creating the commit.
--
Zach
(Top-posted in HTML from a phone)
On Wed, Sep 12, 20
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:30 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> I presume you're suggesting keeping 2017 is so that we don't have
> stray 2015-built artifacts in the cache, which makes sense to me, and
> I have a mild preference for keeping the latest compiler, as that's
> likely the one that people will find
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:23 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:03:48 +0100
> Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 10:55, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > > Who ows the "python" AppVeyor project?
That seems to have fallen to me for the most part.
> > > Can someone please give me t
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Rechecking now, on Gentoo
>
> test_idle appears and passed on these 3.6 and 3.7 pages
> http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/82/builds/414/steps/5/logs/stdio
>
> Neither Firefox nor Edge can find 'test_idle' on these 3.x pages
> http://bui
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> I have suggested that, and before that, the same for buildbots. The reality
> is that tkinter, IDLE, or turtle could be disabled on *nix by regressions
> and the official testing would not notice.
I'm looking into enabling the GUI tests on s
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Mariatta Wijaya
wrote:
> Are there APIs we can use to check the status of builbots?
> Maybe we can have the our bots check for the buildbot status in backport
> PRs.
There is a REST API for buildbot; I have no idea how usable/useful it
is though (but I think the ne
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> These both look like VSTS infrastructure falling over on PRs:
>
> https://python.visualstudio.com/cpython/_build?buildId=522
>
> https://python.visualstudio.com/cpython/_build?buildId=523
>
> I don't see anywhere that gives information
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:05 AM, Paul Goins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just kind of "looking around" at stuff I can help with, and I noticed a few
> days ago that Windows 10 AMD64 builds of Python 3.6/3.7/3.x are generally
> failing.
>
> It seems like the failures started April 16th around 1am per BuildBot a
Hi Martin,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Martin Gainty wrote:
> I was told the python -m test are for devs only to test "auxiliary
> functions"
> do you have a "basic test" i can use to validate Python36 has installed
> properly on Win10?
The fact that the tests run at all show that everythin
On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Alex Walters wrote:
> I am still working on porting code from 2.x to 3.x. As of late on the lists
> I've seen comments about making somewhat major changes in 4.0 - now I'm
> concerned that I should pause my porting effort until that is released. Is
> python 4 goin
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Mariatta Wijaya
wrote:
>> Of course, we would still need to convince people to install it :)
>
>
> Right, that's the challenge :)
> I personally use Chrome (!) and I've been using your Chrome extension, so
> thank you!
> However, I don't feel comfortable making th
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> a platform--in particular it's not clear when a buildbot is considered
> "stable", or how to achieve that without getting necessary fixes
> merged into the main branch in the first place.
I think in this context, "stable" just means "keeps a conn
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:38 AM, INADA Naoki wrote:
>> Like that, how about removing OrderedDict Pure Python implementation
>> from stdlib and require it to implementation?
>
> -1
>
> Like Antoine, I consider the pure Python implementation to be
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 7/24/2017 5:04 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> We have a Windows XP buildbot for Python 2.7, run by David Bolen:
>> http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/x86%20Windows%20XP%202.7/
>>
>> test_bsddb3 fails randomly on this buildbot:
>> http://
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Are you testing for refleaks with gui enabled?
Yes; the refleak builders are running on my Gentoo and Windows
workers, both of which (should have, at least) GUI available and
enabled. However, I have caught Xvfb not running properly on the
G
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Example: appveyor passes for
> https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/2335#discussion_r123724857
>
> Appveyor build fails for 3.6 backport
> https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/2359
> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/python/cpython/build/3.6
with-system-expat=yes` by default
and building from externals on Windows in 3.7, and removing the
bundled expat in 3.8.
>> By the way, Zachary Ware is working on converting this repository to
>> Git. I don't know his progress:
>> - https://github.com/python/cpython-bin-deps
>&
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> I have been saying for several months now that I would like to set up
> a Cygwin buildbot--an important step in making that platform
> supportable again. I now have the infrastructure available to do so
> (Windows VM on an OpenStack infrastructur
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 at 14:43 Victor Stinner
> wrote:
>>
>> 2017-02-13 21:08 GMT+01:00 Brett Cannon :
>> > We now have two sets of labels for representing cherry-picking statuses:
>> > "backport to N.M" and "cherry-pick for N.M". The former a
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Martin Panter wrote:
> As I understand, @reap_threads basically does a join() on each
> background thread, with a total timeout of 1 s. So since your test is
> unlikely to fail between starting threads and joining them, I don’t
> think you need to use @reap_threads
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Question: I need to add a threaded test to the enum test module [1] -- is
> there anything extra I
> need to worry about besides the test itself? Setting or resetting or using
> a tool library, etc?
As far as I know, the only extras to worr
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> For http://buildbot.python.org/all/buildslaves/gps-debian-profile-opt in
> particular (and any others we have using it - if any): Our new
> --with-optimizations configure flag has been renamed to
> --enable-optimizations to be more consist
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Skip Montanaro
wrote:
> I need to do a little 2.6 spelunking. I don't see a 2.6 branch in the output
> of "hg branches". Is "hg clone v2.6.9" the proper incantation to get the
> latest version (or perhaps "v2.6")?
2.6 is a closed branch, which pretty much only mea
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Skip Montanaro
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Victor Stinner
> wrote:
>>
>> Are you on the 2.7 branch or the default branch?
>>
>> You might try to cleanup your checkout:
>>
>> hg up -C -r 2.7
>> make distclean
>> hg purge # WARNING! it removes *all*
Hi Nilesh,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Nilesh Date wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I wanted to install python version 3.4.4 in my RHEL 6 system.
> Can someone give installation process or any reference link from which I can
> get required steps and download desire package.
You have a couple of option
On Apr 26, 2016 07:45, "Franklin? Lee"
wrote:
>
> On Apr 26, 2016 4:02 AM, "Paul Moore" wrote:
> >
> > On 25 April 2016 at 23:55, Franklin? Lee
wrote:
> > > FWIW, Gmail's policies require:
> > [...]
> > > That link is currently the only obvious way to unsubscribe.
> >
> > I'm not sure why gmail'
On Apr 25, 2016 17:08, "Brett Cannon" wrote:
>
> Good point. Hopefully that's all it was then.
Is there any particular reason we include that link in python-dev emails?
We don't for any other list as far as I know.
--
Zach
(On a phone)
___
Python-Dev m
(Cross-posting to python-buildbots, discussion is probably best continued there)
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 13:17 Zachary Ware
> wrote:
>> After receiving a suggestion from koobs several months ago, I've been
>> interm
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last months, most 3.x buildbots failed randomly. Some of them were
> always failing. I spent some time to fix almost all Windows and Linux
> buildbots. There were a lot of different issues.
Thank you for doing this!
> Maybe it's ti
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> If those examples are anywhere close to accurate, an fspath protocol that
> supported both bytes and str seems a lot easier to work with.
But why are you working with bytes paths in the first place? Where did
you get them from, and why could
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Michel Desmoulin
wrote:
> Path objects don't have splitext() or and don't allow "string" / path.
> Those are the ones bugging me the most.
>>> import pathlib
>>> p = '/some/test' / pathlib.Path('path') / 'file_with.ext'
>>> p
PosixPath('/some/test/path/file_with.e
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote:
> Zachary,
>
> Do you run the benchmarks in rigorous mode?
Not currently. I think I need to reschedule when the benchmarks are
run anyway, to avoid conflicts with PyPy's usage of that box, and will
add rigorous mode when I do that.
--
Zach
I'm happy to announce that speed.python.org is finally functional!
There's not much there yet, as each benchmark builder has only sent
one result so far (and one of those involved a bit of cheating on my
part), but it's there.
There are likely to be rough edges that still need smoothing out.
When
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> By the way, this looks odd:
>
> make buildbottest TESTOPTS= TESTPYTHONOPTS= TESTTIMEOUT=3600
> in dir /root/buildarea/3.x.angelico-debian-amd64/build (timeout 3900 secs)
>
> The parameter says 3600 (which corresponds to the error message a
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 23:07 Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> - I wasn't aware of that
>> requirement, so I've never explicitly checked CLA status for folks
>> contributing packaging related PEPs. (And looking at the
>> just-checked-in PEP 513, I appa
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Alexander Walters
wrote:
> This is a mailing list for the development of python itself, not support for
> building it. That said...
>
> 3.4 uses visual studio 2010, for starters. 3.5 uses 2015.
Agreed with all of the above.
You'll be much happier using either 3
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Monday, November 16, 2015, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Brett
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on improving the benchmark set (I think all of
>>> {cpython,pypy,pyston} introduced new benchmarks to the set).
>>
>>
>> We should probably start a maili
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> What am I doing wrong?
Expecting it to work :)
`make doctest` is a Sphinx feature, not specific to our docs. Ideally
someday it should work (and I'll add it to the Docs buildbot), but
nobody has tried to make it work yet. Making it work mi
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Random832 wrote:
> "R. David Murray" writes:
>
>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:59:56 +0300, Stefan Mihaila
>> wrote:
>>> Maybe it's just python2 habits, but I assume I'm not the only one
>>> carelessly thinking that "iterating over an input a second time will
>>> resu
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Zhuo Chen wrote:
> Hi I am interested in setting up a builedbot machine for python, I have a
> 2011 MacBook Pro with custom ssd and OS X Yosemite
Responding off-list.
--
Zach
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@pyth
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:00 AM, R. David Murray
> wrote:
>> I believe gui depends on the existence of the DISPLAY environment
>> variable on unix/linux (that is, TK will fail to start if DISPLAY is not
>> set, so _is_gui_available will re
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Guzman-ballen, Andres
wrote:
> Hello Python Developers!
>
> Why is it that the OpenSSL v1.0.2d that is found on Python’s SVN repo is
> quite different from what OpenSSL has on their GitHub repository for OpenSSL
> v1.0.2d?
The reason for the difference is to avoi
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Best thing I can think of is to post the Roundup search you did to find
> those 400 so thoseof us who can help can just start whittling them away. You
> could also share it with core-mentorship and explain we need help evaluating
> these issue
On Jul 24, 2015 8:30 AM, "Mark Kelley" wrote:
>
> I have been using Python for some time but it's been a decade since
> I've tried to build it from source, back in the 2.4 days. Things seem
> to have gotten a little more complicated now.
>
> I've read through the PCBuild/README file and got most
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> The test could be marked as an expected failure in the interim somitnisnt
> forgotten.
True, but in this case things would be a bit more difficult since the
testcase segfaults rather than just throwing an exception.
--
Zach
_
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 07/07/2015 08:15 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>> This will make harder to notice (and fix!) other regressions.
>
> I don't understand what you are trying to say. If a bug is worth fixing,
> it's worth having a test so we don't have to fix it
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Steve Dower wrote:
> This also makes it more viable to use the Windows SDK compilers. If you
> install the Windows SDK 7.0 (which includes MSVC9) and Windows SDK 7.1 (which
> includes the platform toolset files for MSVC9 - toolsets were invented later
> than th
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:48 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 25.06.2015 17:12, Zachary Ware wrote:
>> The old files are moved to PC/VS9.0, and they work as expected as far
>> as I've tested them.
>
> So it's still possible to build with "just" VS 2008 inst
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:54 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 22.06.2015 19:03, Zachary Ware wrote:
>> Using the backported project files to build 2.7 would require two
>> versions of Visual Studio to be installed; VS2010 (or newer) would be
>> required in addition to VS20
On Jun 23, 2015, at 06:27, Christian Tismer wrote:
> On 23.06.15 06:42, Zachary Ware wrote:
>> Christian, what say you? Would having the project files from 3.5
>> backported to 2.7 (but still using MSVC 9) be positive, negative, or
>> indifferent for Stackless?
>
> I
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I'd suggest explicitly reaching out to the Stackless folks to get
> their feedback. As I believe the switched to a newer compiler and VC
> runtime for Windows a while back, I suspect it will make their lives
> easier rather than harder, but i
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:32 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
>> OK, so what you are saying is that speed.python.org will run a buildbot
>> slave so that when a change is committed to cPython, a speed run will be
>> triggered? Is "the runner"
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
wrote:
>> I'd like to backport those new project files to 2.7,
>
> Would this change anything about how extensions are built?
>
> There is now the "ms compiler for 2.7" would that work? Or only in
> concert with VS2010 express?
It shoul
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Steve Dower wrote:
> Zachary Ware wrote:
>> With the stipulation that the officially supported compiler won't change, I
>> want
>> to make sure there's no major opposition to replacing the old project files
>> in
>> PC
Hi,
As you may know, Steve Dower put significant effort into rewriting the
project files used by the Windows build as part of moving to VC14 as
the official compiler for Python 3.5. Compared to the project files
for 3.4 (and older), the new project files are smaller, cleaner,
simpler, more easily
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
> The buildbots currently live in a state of denial about the 3.5 branch.
> Could someone whisper tenderly in their collective shell-like ears so that
> they start building 3.5, in addition to 3.4 and trunk?
The 3.5 branch seems to be set up
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Python 2.7.8+ (default, May 13 2015, 16:46:29) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]
> on win32
>
> Shouldn't this be 2.7.9+ or 2.7.10rc1?
Make sure your repository is up to date, the patchlevel is correct at
the current tip of the 2.7 branch.
--
Zach
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> On 13.05.15 09:32, zach.ware wrote:
>>
>> https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d3582826d24c
>> changeset: 96006:d3582826d24c
>> user:Zachary Ware
>> date:Wed May 13 01:21:21 2015 -05
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:40:40PM -0400, Eric V. Smith wrote:
>> But, I don't see a lot of keyword-only parameters being added to stdlib
>> code. Is there some position we've taken on this? Barring someone saying
>> "stdlib APIs shouldn't
In issue23903, I've created a script that will produce PC/python3.def
by scraping the header files in Include. There are are many many
discrepencies between what my script generates and what is currently
in the repository (diff below), but in every case I've checked the
script has been right: what
On Thursday, April 2, 2015, Ethan Furman wrote:
> I just built the latest version of Python 2.7 on my development machine --
> or so I thought. When I invoke it, I get:
>
> Python 2.7.6+ (2.7:1beb3e0507fa, Apr 2 2015, 17:57:53)
>
> Why am I not seeing 2.7.9?
>
https://hg.python.org/cpython/
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:11 AM, raymond.hettinger
wrote:
> https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/393189326adb
> changeset: 95350:393189326adb
> user:Raymond Hettinger
> date:Wed Apr 01 08:11:09 2015 -0700
> summary:
> Check deques against common sequence tests (except for slicing
On Mar 25, 2015 9:28 PM, "Nick Coghlan" wrote:
>
> On 26 March 2015 at 01:57, Steve Dower wrote:
> > Zachary Ware wrote:
> >> On Mar 25, 2015 4:22 AM, "Paul Moore" wrote:
> >>> On a related note, is there any information available on how th
On Mar 25, 2015 4:22 AM, "Paul Moore" wrote:
>
> On 25 March 2015 at 09:09, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > I'm not sure we guarantee anything. In any case, it's only a small
> > proportion of the kind of crashes you can get by messing the signature.
>
> Fair point. I guess what I'm asking is, would it
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> I'd be willing to contemplate helping out on the Windows side of
> things, if nobody else steps up (with the proviso that I have little
> free time, and I'm saying this without much idea of what's involved
> :-)) If Zachary can give a bit more
I started this message about 3 months ago; at this point I'm just
getting it posted so it stops rotting in my Drafts folder.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Jim J. Jewett wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014, at 14:13, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> ... http://bugs.python.org/issue23085 ...
>> is there a
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Blaxton
wrote:
> I am using the spec file that comes with Python source code which downloaded
> from python.org website
> source file is set on spec file to file with bz2 format while there is only
> .xz and zipped are available to download.
>
>
> I thought someho
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Zachary Ware
> wrote:
>> Yes, importlib.h changes should never be included in a patch (it would
>
> Unless they should. :) E.g. you modified importlib/_bootstrap.py, the
> marshal format
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> I'm working on a patch for the Python launcher. I built Python
> (current tip, on MS Windows, with VS 2015), and I've just noticed that
> hg status shows:
>
>>>hg status -mard
> M Doc\using\windows.rst
> M PC\launcher.c
> M Python\importlib.h
>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Cyd Haselton wrote:
> Hello,
> I've finally managed to build a (somewhat) working Python port for the
> Android tablet I'm using. Unfortunately, as I quickly found out,
> Python's built-in help function requires tkinter, which requires
> tcl/tk.
What version of
On Saturday, January 24, 2015, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Fri Jan 23 2015 at 5:45:28 PM Gregory P. Smith > wrote:
>
>> On Fri Jan 23 2015 at 11:20:02 AM M.-A. Lemburg > > wrote:
>>
>>> On 23.01.2015 19:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> > On 01/23/2015 06:30 PM, Cyd Haselton wrote:
>>> >> Related to my
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed the SP1 for Visual Studio 2010, and it looks like that it
> broke my Windows SDK 7.1 (setenv was missing, cl.exe was also
> missing). I uninstalled the SDK 7.1, and then I saw that a patch is
> required to use Windows SDK
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> """
> Quick Start Guide
> -
>
> 1. Install Microsoft Visual Studio 2015, any edition.
Note that this isn't precisely true; any VS 2010 SP1 or newer *should*
work, as you already know :).
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To compile Python on Windows, there are a few information in the
> Developer Guide:
> https://docs.python.org/devguide/setup.html#windows-compiling
>
> Python 3.5 now requires Visual Studio 2010 *SP1*, or newer Visual Studio:
> http:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:24 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> Note: it can be made even less compelling by making it a lot easier to
> build CPython on Windows without having an MSVC license (which I think
> means not using the GUI, for which I say *yay* :). I think Zach Ware
> has been working on im
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:24:38 -0400
>> "R. David Murray" wrote:
>>>
>>> I know I for one do not generally test patches on Windows because I
>>> haven't taken the time to learn how to
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Christian Tismer wrote:
> My impression is that no 3.X user ever would want to stick
> with any older version.
>
> Is that true, or am I totally wrong?
My impression is that you're mostly right, but only because those who
would still be on 3.1 are actually still on
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> 3. security: "fixing issues exploitable by attackers such as crashes,
> privilege escalation and, optionally, other issues such as denial of
> service attacks. Any other changes are not considered a security risk
> and thus not backported to a se
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> test_codecs is not happy. Looking at the subject lines of commit emails from
>> the past day I don't see any obvious cause.
>
> Looks like this was caus
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> test_codecs is not happy. Looking at the subject lines of commit emails from
> the past day I don't see any obvious cause.
Looks like this was caused by the change I made to regrtest in [1] to
fix refleak testing in test_asyncio [2]. I'm look
I'd like to point out a couple of compiler warnings on Windows:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:45 PM, antoine.pitrou
wrote:
> diff --git a/Modules/_io/bytesio.c b/Modules/_io/bytesio.c
> --- a/Modules/_io/bytesio.c
> +++ b/Modules/_io/bytesio.c
> @@ -33,6 +37,45 @@
> return NULL; \
> }
>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if Python 3.5 will still support Windows XP or
> not. Almost all flavors of Windows XP reached the end-of-life in
> April, 2014 except "Windows XP Embedded". There is even an hack to use
> Windows upgrades on the
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Ben Hoyt wrote:
>>> To solve this problem, what do people think about adding an
>>> "st_winattrs" attribute to the object returned by os.stat() on
>>> Windows?
>>
>> +1 to the idea, whatever the exact implementation.
>
> Cool.
>
> I think we should add a st_winattr
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 06/09/2014 09:02 PM, Ben Hoyt wrote:
>> To solve this problem, what do people think about adding an
>> "st_winattrs" attribute to the object returned by os.stat() on
>> Windows?
>
>
> +1 to the idea, whatever the exact implementation.
Agr
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Steve Dower wrote:
> Thoughts/comments/concerns?
My only concern is support for elderly versions of Windows, in
particular: XP. I seem to recall the last "let's update our MSVC
version" discussion dying off because of XP support. Even though MS
has abandoned it,
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> I updated the 2.7 buildbot scripts to pull in Tcl/Tk 8.5.15 a couple
> of weeks ago (see http://bugs.python.org/issue21303), but hadn't
> gotten anything done with Tix yet. It should just need python.mak
> updated to point
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:36 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 08.05.14 18:59, schrieb Brian Curtin:
>> This is mostly a question for Martin, but perhaps someone else would also
>> know.
>>
>> I'm trying to build the 2.7 installers so I can backport the path
>> option from 3.3, but I can't seem to
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
