> Python has consistently refused to be turned into a platform for DSLs for
> almost 3 decades.
I think SymPy, PyMC, Pyomo, Pyro, and many more packages would all be very
surprised to hear they're no longer welcome in Python. Still, it seems like it
would be quite hard to kick them out, and wo
I think that's exactly the problem with a lack of Python macros. The full
quote, of course, goes: "There should be one-- and preferably only one
--*obvious* way to do it."
Often, there's a mathematical notation for something, and *this* is the only
obvious way to write anything out. But this do
Unfortunately, it's no longer being maintained.
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mai
It looks like this hasn't gone anywhere in the past few years, which is a
shame. Syntactic macros are one of the 2 or 3 "Killer features" that pushed me
out of Python and into Julia (along with JITting inferred types and multiple
dispatch). Math+data science code written in Julia is a lot more r
