face"?
- Is there an easy way to convert the current code using ctypes to
cffi?
Thanks in advance!
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.o
Hi,
> I, too, was thinking /24. I think that overflowing the host portion
> should raise OverflowError.
>
Just curiosity, why not a modulo calculation on the subnet instead
of raising the error?
Thanks in advance!
francis
___
Python-Dev mai
om/giraldeau/python-profile-ust
This is of course very experimental, requires a special setup, an I don't
even know if it's going to produce good results. I'll report the results in
the coming weeks.
Cheers,
Francis Giraldeau
___
Python-Dev
er will use the thread local frame pointer
instead of calling PyEval_GetFrame(). Does that sounds good?
Thanks again for your feedback!
Francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
to
make sure this assumption is valid.
Thanks!
Francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
t can be customised to meet
the needs of the CPython core development team
"""
I like the PEP.
PS: Should this be forwarded to python-workflow or is that other list to
be considered obsolete?
Regards,
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
rible and silly function show_type() to run
every Py*_Check() to determine the type of a PyObject *. What would be the
sane way to do that?
Your comments are very valuable. Thanks!
Francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.pyt
2014-11-22 7:44 GMT-05:00 Julian Taylor :
> On 17.11.2014 23:09, Francis Giraldeau wrote:
> > Hi,
> > ...
> > The PEP-418 is about performance counters, but there is no mention o
> > Anyway, I think we must change CPython to support tools such as perf.
> > Any
Anyway, I think we must change CPython to support tools such as perf. Any
thoughts?
Cheers,
Francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/op
/~amoeller/papers/tajs/
Good luck!
Francis
2014-11-17 9:49 GMT-05:00 Stefan Bucur :
> I'm developing a Python static analysis tool that flags common programming
> errors in Python programs. The tool is meant to complement other tools like
> Pylint (which perform checks at lexical and s
starts
a build an sends per e-mail the results to some address.
Thanks in advance!
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python
On 08/17/2014 03:28 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I've seen a few people on python-ideas express the assumption that
there will be another Py3k style compatibility break for Python 4.0.
I've also had people express the concern that "you broke compatibility
in a major way once, how do we know you won't
On 06/23/2014 10:12 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
The stats graphs are based on the data generated for the
weekly issue report. I have a patched version of that
report that adds the bug/enhancement info. I'll try to dig
it up this week; someone ping me if I forget :) It think
the patch will need
committers :)
more patch writers: yes,
more patch reviewers: yes,
more committers: ?? automate!! :-)
Regards,
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https
ssues with patch”,
means that the ones not listed there are in “needs patch”
or “new” status?
Regards,
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.o
Hi Nathaniel,
their fault for not having a sense of humor. Trying to further defend this
position is just going to dig you in deeper, so let's drop the discussion
here.
You're right, the formulation wasn't correct. My excuses. I just better
do the review. Thanks.
R
searching for the "Gentlemen" word?). Just a joke ;-)
Regards,
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
yObject?
Thanks in advance!
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On 02/07/2014 06:07 PM, Python tracker wrote:
Open issues with patches: 2045
Has somebody done a graphic of that data againsttime?
Regards,
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
hange was that it simplified the
compiler a bit,
not that it was broken or not useful.
I'm not sure if that's applicable or other issues arise with:
def fn(*p): px,py,qx,qy = p; return ((px - qx) ** 2 + (py - qy) ** 2) ** 0.5
Thanks in a
)
Regards,
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Food for thought: maybe we should have variable-encoding lengths for
all opcodes, rather than the current cumbersome scheme?
Funny, it sounds like UTF-8 :-)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/p
On 03/31/2013 09:13 PM, francis wrote:
why is printing new ?
read twice before you write :-)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options
and two instances
i1 = Int1()
i2 = Int2()
we get the following behaviour:
>>> type(int(i1))
I would have expected 'Int1'
>>> type(float(i1))
>>> type(float(i2))
>>> isinstance(int(i1), int)
True
>>> isinstance(int(i2), int)
new
True
>>> isinstance(float(i1), float)
True
>>> isinstanc
You can use idle from the command line almost as easily as the CP
interpreter: 'python -m idlelib' instead of just 'python' (I just
tried it to verify). Unlike bare 'python', IDLE includes a grep. Right
click on any 'hit' and it opens the file at the specified line. Unlike
bare 'python', you
hanks and Happy 2013!
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
ge.
Thank you!
Is there a easy way to automate this?:
- Get a list the "waiting for review" issues
- Get the last patch
- Try to apply that patch to the version(s) to check if that patch
already applies?
Regards,
francis
___
Most recent 15 issues waiting for review (15)
=
Just curious: How is a issue considered "waiting for review"?
Thanks!
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@pytho
Hi Alex,
just a small info (view pep-0424.txt @ 4491:7838a83c3ad1):
- Section Proposal:
[...] than the actual size >>> ofthe <<< container. [...]
- Section Rationale:
The first line is really long (seems to need a newline before
``__length_hint__``)
(from it's doc: “This project is intended to be an
authoritative source of benchmarks for all Python implementations.”)
Thanks in advance !
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
n ‘dict_popitem’:
Objects/dictobject.c:2208:5: error: ‘PyDictKeyEntry’ has no member named
‘me_value’
make: *** [Objects/dictobject.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
Cheers
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@
Just more info: changeset is: 74843:20702d1acf17
Cheers,
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail
Hi Brett,
If that's the case I might as well add it as part of my mnfy project's
verification run I do over the stdlib if someone doesn't beat me to it.
Is that devinabox ?
Thanks in advance !
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing
I still have gdb 6.somthing,
would you mail me the full output please,
so I can see what the problem is.
It's done, let me know if you need more output.
Cheers,
francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.pytho
On 01/29/2012 11:31 AM, Mark Shannon wrote:
It passes all the tests.
(I had to change a couple that relied on dict repr() ordering)
Hi Mark,
I've cloned the repo, build it the I've tried with ./python -m test. I
got some errors:
First in general:
340 tests OK.
2 tests failed:
test_dis te
ting where part of the process itself do you thing that
that would
be an issue anymore?
PS: I know that there’s a pep8 checker so it could be transformed into a
reformatter
but I don't know if theres a pep7 checker (reformater)
Best regards!
francis
___
.. (I thing that 'go' has some
autoformater or a standard way of formatting).
-- francis
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
37 matches
Mail list logo
