Re: [Python-Dev] Postponing the first betas

2008-06-03 Thread r.m.oudkerk
On 02/06/2008, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > meantime, Guido said: > > "I'd also like to see PEP 3138 (CJK-friendly repr()) and the > pyprocessing PEP implemented by then, and perhaps some other small > stuff." The pyprocessing unit tests crash with a fatal error when run on Linux with

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 371 Discussion (pyProcessing Module)

2008-05-31 Thread r.m.oudkerk
On 31/05/2008, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/5/30 Farshid Lashkari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I'm not sure if there will be any side affects to modifying >> sys.executable though. Should this be the official way of supporting >> embedded interpreters or should there be a >> multiprocess

Re: [Python-Dev] Addition of "pyprocessing" module to standard lib.

2008-05-16 Thread r.m.oudkerk
2008/5/14 "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I really do feel that inclusion of this library offers us the best of >> both worlds - it gives us (as a community) an easy answer to those >> people who would dismiss python due to the GIL and it also allows >> users to easily implement their app