Re: [Python-Dev] versioned .so files for Python 3.2

2010-07-24 Thread schmir
Barry Warsaw writes: > On Jul 23, 2010, at 01:46 PM, sch...@gmail.com wrote: > >>Doesn't anybody else think this is lost work for very little gain? My >>/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages directory consumes 200MB on disk. I >>couldn't care less if my /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages consumed the >>

Re: [Python-Dev] versioned .so files for Python 3.2

2010-07-23 Thread schmir
Ronald Oussoren writes: > On 23 Jul, 2010, at 11:54, Barry Warsaw wrote: > >> >> What about the architecture (i386, amd64)? With every increase in length I >> start to get more concerned. We could encode the platform and architecture, >> but that gets into cryptic territory. OTOH, would you r