-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 1, 2008, at 7:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Barry The dependency on gtk is unnecessary and means it can
effectively
Barry only be run on Linux. Specifically it means I can't do
releases
Barry on OS X. I don't see much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 1, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
The fact that Barry found Anthony's process unusable is IMO not a
reflection on either Barry or Anthony's code. Release processes seem
to be highly personal, even within the same project.
Barry True, but it's just more moving parts to break, especially when I
Barry don't really feel a u/i buys you much[*].
Barry [*] Skip knows me as a diehard XEmacser so that statement can
Barry pretty much define my standard answer to all such questions. :)
So if we put together
With apologies to Anthony, welease is crack. I made pretty good
progress once I ditched it and starting doing things manually.
Between now and the next alpha I intend to work on a command line
script to help with releases. If you're interested in helping, let me
know.
I guess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 1, 2008, at 5:37 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
With apologies to Anthony, welease is crack. I made pretty good
progress once I ditched it and starting doing things manually.
Between now and the next alpha I intend to work on a command
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I guess every release manager is free to come up with his own set of
tools, but I feel you've given up too quickly (or started too late -
perhaps a test release run a few days before the release would have
helped).
In any case, I'm willing to help with welease, but
It may sound like a dumb question by why do we need a release tool at
all? I was involved in the release process of 3.0a2. Almost every step
of the build process required human interaction. I don't want to
diminish the effort that was put into welease though. But maybe (!) the
same time
Barry The dependency on gtk is unnecessary and means it can effectively
Barry only be run on Linux. Specifically it means I can't do releases
Barry on OS X. I don't see much benefit in having a gui tool for doing
Barry releases.
Gtk and Glade are available through MacPorts, at
Christian Heimes writes:
It may sound like a dumb question by why do we need a release tool
at all? I was involved in the release process of 3.0a2. Almost
every step of the build process required human interaction.
Interaction, yes, but often it can be reduced to Abort, retry, fail?
I
