[Python-Dev] 2.7.4 is inevitable

2013-03-17 Thread Benjamin Peterson
I am going to cut the 2.7.4 release branch next weekend (March 23, 24). Things which are breaking the buildbots at the point will be backed out. Owners of current release blockers will be poked, but nothing is going to hold up the release. The show must go on. Benjamin

Re: [Python-Dev] 2.7.4

2013-02-03 Thread Brett Cannon
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Nadeem Vawda wrote: > Just to clarify, the release branch hasn't been created yet, correct? > > It's by tag and no: http://hg.python.org/cpython/tags -Brett > - Nadeem > > > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > >> 2013/2/3 Serhiy Storchaka

Re: [Python-Dev] 2.7.4

2013-02-03 Thread Nadeem Vawda
Just to clarify, the release branch hasn't been created yet, correct? - Nadeem On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2013/2/3 Serhiy Storchaka : > > There are crashers for which patches were proposed but do not reviewed > yet: > > > > Issue #6083: Reference counting bug in

Re: [Python-Dev] 2.7.4

2013-02-03 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2013/2/3 Serhiy Storchaka : > There are crashers for which patches were proposed but do not reviewed yet: > > Issue #6083: Reference counting bug in PyArg_ParseTuple and > PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords. > > Issue #7358: cStringIO not 64-bit safe. > > Issue #16137: Using time.asctime() with an array w

Re: [Python-Dev] 2.7.4

2013-02-03 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
There are crashers for which patches were proposed but do not reviewed yet: Issue #6083: Reference counting bug in PyArg_ParseTuple and PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords. Issue #7358: cStringIO not 64-bit safe. Issue #16137: Using time.asctime() with an array with negative tm_hour causes Python Cr

Re: [Python-Dev] 2.7.4

2013-01-19 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 19.01.2013 20:30, schrieb Benjamin Peterson: > It's been almost a year since 2.7.3, so it's time for another 2.7 > bugfix release. > > 2013-02-02 - 2.7.4 release branch created; rc released > 2013-02-16 - 2.7.4 released > > Does this work for you, Martin and Ned? I would propose to sync this

Re: [Python-Dev] 2.7.4

2013-01-19 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 14:30 -0500, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > It's been almost a year since 2.7.3, so it's time for another 2.7 > bugfix release. > > 2013-02-02 - 2.7.4 release branch created; rc released > 2013-02-16 - 2.7.4 released > > Does this work for you, Martin and Ned? I have a pet issu

Re: [Python-Dev] 2.7.4

2013-01-19 Thread Simon Cross
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > It's been almost a year since 2.7.3, so it's time for another 2.7 > bugfix release. > > 2013-02-02 - 2.7.4 release branch created; rc released > 2013-02-16 - 2.7.4 released The Cape Town Python User Group is having a Python Bug Day next

Re: [Python-Dev] 2.7.4

2013-01-19 Thread Ned Deily
In article , Benjamin Peterson wrote: > It's been almost a year since 2.7.3, so it's time for another 2.7 > bugfix release. > > 2013-02-02 - 2.7.4 release branch created; rc released > 2013-02-16 - 2.7.4 released > > Does this work for you, Martin and Ned? That works for me. There are also s

[Python-Dev] 2.7.4

2013-01-19 Thread Benjamin Peterson
It's been almost a year since 2.7.3, so it's time for another 2.7 bugfix release. 2013-02-02 - 2.7.4 release branch created; rc released 2013-02-16 - 2.7.4 released Does this work for you, Martin and Ned? -- Regards, Benjamin ___ Python-Dev mailing li