On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am accepting Todd Rovito's and Terry Reedy's PEP 434, officially
declaring IDLE to be an application bundled with Python, with the
contents of
Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to
alternative Python implementations.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:33:38 +0200
Simon Cross hodgestar+python...@gmail.com wrote:
Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to
alternative Python implementations.
Why?
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:33:38 +0200
Simon Cross hodgestar+python...@gmail.com wrote:
Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to
alternative Python implementations.
Why?
I don't think it's worth
Yes, it would probably make more sense to split the editor and shell
processes as many Python IDEs do, with IDLE running in CPython and the
user's computation running in the chosen interpreter.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Simon Cross hodgestar+python...@gmail.com
wrote:
Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to
alternative Python implementations.
I suspect it's too hard. I remember seeing some work on anygui.py that
looked like an attempt to make these
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:36:39 -0700
fwierzbi...@gmail.com fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Simon Cross hodgestar+python...@gmail.com
wrote:
Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to
alternative Python implementations.
I suspect it's too
I am accepting Todd Rovito's and Terry Reedy's PEP 434, officially
declaring IDLE to be an application bundled with Python, with the
contents of Lib/idlelib exempt from the usual no new features in
maintenance releases rule.
As stated in the PEP, this isn't carte blanche to do major rewrites in
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am accepting Todd Rovito's and Terry Reedy's PEP 434, officially
declaring IDLE to be an application bundled with Python, with the
contents of Lib/idlelib exempt from the usual no new features in
maintenance releases
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.comwrote:
Does that mean that mainstream idle development should move out of the
python tree?
No the acceptance of PEP-434 does not mean IDLE development should move out
of the python tree. The acceptance of PEP-434 means that
10 matches
Mail list logo
