Re: [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 587 (Python Initialization Configuration)

2019-05-27 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, Thanks Thomas for accepting my PEP :-) Thanks everyone who was involved in discussions since it started July 2018! For the first version of my PEP 587, I tried to design an API as small as possible, but it was clear that it didn't fit all use cases. Slowly, I extended and adjusted the API to

Re: [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 587 (Python Initialization Configuration)

2019-05-26 Thread Terry Reedy
On 5/26/2019 10:02 AM, Thomas Wouters wrote: As PEP-delegate, I'm accepting version 5 of PEP 587 (Python Initialization Configuration). ... Thanks, Victor, for pushing this massive amount of work through; And thanks to you for reviewing and approving. it won't affect most people using Py

[Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 587 (Python Initialization Configuration)

2019-05-26 Thread Thomas Wouters
As PEP-delegate, I'm accepting version 5 of PEP 587 (Python Initialization Configuration). I don't think Victor has posted the latest version, but it contains a couple of minor renames, and a new private API to allow us to experiment with two-phase initialisation of Python. There's still time to d